Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33085 (CHH)

Gajendra Singh Verma v. Kranti Kumar Rajput

ACQA/171/2015 · 2025-08-28

Shri Radhakishan Agrawal, Shri Sanjay Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ACQA No. 171 of 2015 • Gajendra Singh Verma S/o Jangal Singh, Aged About 62 Years, R/o Village Kaurakapa, Tehsil And P.S. Nawagarh, District Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. ... Appellant versus 1. Kranti Kumar Rajput S/o Dukhiram, Aged About 25 Years, 2 Bhupendra Singh S/o Bhikham Singh, Aged About 25 Years, Both Are R/o Village Kaurakapa, P.S. Nawagarh, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh. 3. Ramchandra Adile S/o Ramgulam, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Siltara, P.S. - Pathariya, District - Mungeli Chhattisgarh. 4. Arun Alias Annu Singh S/o Ramgopal Rajput, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Village Dakachaka, P.S. - Pathariya, District - Mungeli Chhattisgarh. 5. Umashankar Sahu S/o Padum Sahu, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Murha, P.S. - Nawagarh, District - Bemetara Chhattisgarh. 6. Dhananjay Sharma S/o Shatrughan Prasad, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Dakachaka, P.S. - Pathariya, District - Mungeli Chhattisgarh. 7. State Of Chhattisgarh Through District Magistrate, Mungeli Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) CHANDRAKANT DEWANGAN Digitally signed by CHANDRAKANT DEWANGAN Date: 2025.08.29 17:08:07 +0530 2 For Appellant : None. For Respondents No. 1 & 2 : Mr. Vikas Bajpai, Advocate. For Respondents No.3 to 6 : None. For Respondent No.7/State : Ms. Pragya Pandey, Dy. Govt. Advocate. DB: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal & Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal Order On Board 29/08/2025 1) The matter was passed over once in absence of any representation on behalf of the Appellant. Even in the second call none appeared, nor any representation is made on behalf of the Appellant. 2) Under these circumstances, this Court is left with no other option, except to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3) Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. -Sd/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) Judge -Sd/- (Radhakishan Agrawal) Judge Chandrakant