IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.19769 & 19772 of 2025 Decided on: 16.12.2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CWP No.19769 of 2025 Sunny …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and ors. .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. CWP No.19772 of 2025 Vikash Vashishth …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and ors. .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Ms. Aditi Rana, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. L.N.Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. L.N.Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matters are heard at this stage. 3. Petitioners seek regularization of their services. Their cases are that they preferred representations alongwith others on 17.04.2025 (Annexure P-5) to respondent No.3 seeking regularization but the aforesaid representations have not been considered and decided as yet. Reliance in support of their claim has been made upon in Jaggo Vs. Union of India and others2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer. 4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matters, these writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment in the case of Jaggo2 within a period of 2 SLP(C) No. 5580 of 2024 decied on 20.12.2025. 3 six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioners. The writ petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua December 16, 2025 Judge R.Atal