Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:32902
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3654 of 2025 1 - Ku. Mala Mahanand D/o Sant Gyani Mahanand, Aged About 30 Years R/o G-8, Phase-Ii, Gulshan Vatika, Sejbahar, District - Raipur (C.G.).
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.). 2 - Director, Directorate Of Technical Education Chhattisgarh, Indrawati Bhawan, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.). 3 - Chhattisgarh Swami Vivekanand Technical University Bhilai Through Its Registrar, District Durg (C.G.). 4 - Columbia Institute Of Pharmacy, Through Its Principal, Mandhar, Tekari Vidhan Sabha Road, District Raipur (C.G.). ----Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Achyut Tiwari, Advocate For Respondent-State
: Mr. Satish Gupta, G.A. Hon’ble Shri
Arvind Kumar Verma
Order on Board 15/07/2025
1. Counsel for the Petitioner prays for the following relief(s):-
“(I) That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the record relating to petitioners’ matter. (ii) That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to allow the petitioner to complete her rest one year course of B. Pharmacy consisting of 7th and 8th Semesters from the respondent No. 3 & 4 and also to allow her to give aforesaid examinations, in the interest of justice. Digitally signed by JYOTI JHA Date: 2025.07.16 11:05:07 +0530
2 (iii) That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to consider and allow applications dated 28.12.2024 (Annexure P/7) and 16.06.2025 (Annexure P/8) preferred by petitioner, in the interest of justice. (Iv) Any other relief, which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a student of B. Pharmacy in the College of respondent no.4. She cleared PPHT Examination in the year 2014 and got admission in the College of respondent no.4 for completion of course namely B. Pharmacy. She was continuously studying for 03 years upto 6 semester i.e. from year 2014 upto 2017. As petitioner's father namely Sant Gyani Mahanand was terminated on 04.11.2015 from the post of Peon, financial condition of the petitioner's family was not good and therefore petitioner could not deposit requisite fees with the respondent college and respondent college debarred petitioner from her studies and did not allow petitioner to give examination. Recently, vide order dated 07.12.2023 passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP(S) No. 6318/2016 in favour of petitioner's father, as and when father of petitioner joined the services again, petitioner preferred an application on 28.12.2024 before the respondent authorities to allow her for further studies, again she preferred another application on 16.06.2025, when admissions are going to be taken place, till date respondent authorities neither considered petitioner's application nor allowed her for her further studies, therefore he prays for a
3 direction to the respondent authorities to decide the same.
3.
Learned counsel for respondents submits that in the present matter, the respondent No. 3 is the contesting party.
4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case instead of keeping this petition pending, I find it appropriate to dispose of the same at this stage directing the petitioner to file a fresh application/representation along with all relevant documents and copy of this order before the respondent No. 3, in turn the respondent No. 3 is expected to decide the representation in an objective manner and to pass a reasoned order within a period of 30 days from the date of representation filed by the petitioner in accordance with law.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not observed anything on the merits of the case.
7. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Jyoti