Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:JHHC:33128 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 4754 of 2025 Suresh Kumar @ Suresh Chandra Kumhar @ Suresh Kumhar, aged about 47 years, son of Narayan Prajapati @ Narayan Kumhar, Resident of Village Jonha, P.O and P.S. Angara, District Ranchi --- --- Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand --- --- Opp. Party --- CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ambuj Nath --- For the Petitioner: Mr. Amit Kr. Sinha, Advocate For the O.P-State: Mr. Shashi Kr. Verma, A.P.P. For the Informant: M/s Rajesh Kr. Tiwari, Vishwanath Moon, Ritesh Kr. Sahu, Advocates --- 07 / 06.11.2025 Heard the parties. 2. Petitioner has been made accused in connection with Angara P.S. Case No. 52 of 2023 for the offences registered under sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of Smt. Ila Kandpal, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Ranchi. 3. It is alleged that the petitioner had helped the Informant and her husband in disposing of their land for more than one crore rupees. Petitioner got a joint bank account opened in the name of the Informant and her husband. He also got a mobile number attached with the said account which belonged to the witness Kalawati Devi. Petitioner also enticed the husband of the Informant to handover several signed blank cheques, so that which he could get the money transferred in another bank account. After the death of the husband of the Informant, when the Informant inquired about the status of her bank account, she came to know that entire money was withdrawn. During the course of investigation, Kalawati Devi whose mobile phone was attached with the said account of the Informant has stated that it was the petitioner who was using her mobile phone. Some of the witnesses have also stated that the petitioner has cheated several persons. Some of the witnesses have also stated that after embezzling the aforesaid amount, petitioner has purchased land and also constructed a house in his village. 4. Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail stands rejected. Learned Trial Court shall expedite the trial. (Ambuj Nath, J) November 06, 2025 Ranjeet/ Uploaded