Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33078 (AP)

MADDIRALA VENKATA RAO v. CHUNDURI VIJALA LAKSHMI ALIAS IMMADISETTI VIJAYA LAKSHMI

CRP/2500/2023 · 2025-06-24

T C D Sekhar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 TCDS,J C.R.P.No.2500 of 2023 APHC010492972023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2500/2023 Between: 1. MADDIRALA VENKATA RAO, S/0 M NARAYANA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O KHOJJILLIPETA, MACHILIPATNAM KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. MOPIDEVI VASAVI RAJA RAJESWARI., W/O. PAVAN KUMAR, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O VIJAYAWADA. 3. RAMADASU VIJAYA LAKSHMI,, W/O. SAL KIRAN, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O HYDERABAD. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. CHUNDURI VIJALA LAKSHMI ALIAS IMMADISETTI VIJAYA LAKSHMI, w/o late Lakshmi Narayana Hindu, aged 74 Years, retired., employee, R/o Circlepet, Machilipatnam ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to beg to present this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition to this Hon'ble Court against the Order dated 07- 2 TCDS,J C.R.P.No.2500 of 2023 07-2023 made in I.A No. 278/2023 in 0.5 No. 352/2015, on the file of the Court of Additional Senior Civil Judge, Machilipatnam IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including trail of the suit in 0. S. No. 352 of 2015, on the file of the Court of Additional Senior Civil Judge, Machilipatnam pending the above CRP and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. S V BHARATHA LAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent: 1. S MURALI MOHAN 3 TCDS,J C.R.P.No.2500 of 2023 The Court made the following order: It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the cause in the revision petition does not survive. 2. The said submission is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 4. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR Date: 25.06.2025 KGR