Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33071 (AP)

Salady Mulaswamy Naidu v. The Superintending Engineer

WP/32237/2012 · 2025-02-17

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010493372012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 32237/2012 Between: Salady Mulaswamy Naidu ...PETITIONER AND The Superintending Engineer ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SUDHAKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) The Court made the following: 2 Order:- There is no representation for the petitioner today. 2. The learned Standing Counsel representing the respondent submits that the petitioner was not in service as on the date of the notification, and his claim for regularization has not been considered. 3. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 17.02.2025 PNS