Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33067 (HP)

VINOD KUMAR v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/20420/2025 · 2025-12-23

Sushil Kukreja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.20420 of 2025 Decided on: 23.12.2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vinod Kumar …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and another .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Vaibhav Tanwar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sushil Kukreja Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has preferred representation dated 08.12.2025 (Annexure P-1) to respondent No.2 for the redressal of his grievances raised in this writ petition. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner would 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 be content in case respondent No.2/competent authority is directed to decide the aforesaid representation within a fixed time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer. 4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner dated 08.12.2025 (Annexure P-1) in accordance with law and applicable transfer policy within a period of two weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. ( Sushil Kukreja ) December 23, 2025 Judge R.Atal/Mukesh