IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 263-1 RAVINDER MAMTA ALIAS MEM KALAN AND ANR. CORAM: HON’BLE M Present : None for the petitioner. Mr. Vatsal Raj, Advocate for the respondents. KIRTI SINGH A perusal of the case file shows that dates of hearing, none had appeared there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner despite the fact that the case has been called twice It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue case anymore. Hence, the same is dismissed for want of prosecu 21.07.2025 Jyoti-IV IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M Date of decision: Versus MAMTA ALIAS MEM KALAN AND ANR. HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH None for the petitioner. Mr. Vatsal Raj, Advocate for the respondents. **** KIRTI SINGH, J. (oral) A perusal of the case file shows that dates of hearing, none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner despite the fact that the case has been called twice It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue more. Hence, the same is dismissed for want of prosecu (KIRTI SINGH Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH M No.16083 OF 2023 Date of decision: 21.07.2025 …. Petitioner MAMTA ALIAS MEM KALAN AND ANR. …. Respondents KIRTI SINGH Mr. Vatsal Raj, Advocate for the respondents. A perusal of the case file shows that on the last three effective on behalf of the petitioner. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner despite the fact that the It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the present more. Hence, the same is dismissed for want of prosecution. KIRTI SINGH ) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No on the last three effective Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner despite the fact that the the present Jyoti 2025.07.23 10:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document