Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WMP(MD)No.29220 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 17.04.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI WMP(MD)No.29220 of 2025 in W.P(MD)No.31975 of 2025 M.Balasubramanian ... Petitioner Vs. 1. N.Shanmugasundaram
2. The District Collector, Thenkasi District, Thenkasi. 3. The Tahsildar, Sankarankovil Taluk, Thenkasi District. 4. The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Thoothukudi. 5. The Executive Officer, A/m. Palvannanathar Swami Temple, Karivalamvanthanallur, Sankarankovil Taluk, Thenkasi District. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WMP(MD)No.29220 of 2025
6. The Panchayat Secretary, Karivalamvanthanallur Panchayath, Sankarankovil Taluk, Thenkasi District. ... Respondents PRAYER :- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to implead the petitioner as one of the respondents in WP(MD)No.31975 of 2025 and connected writ miscellaneous petitions. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Anandkumar For R1 : Mr.M.Karthikeya Venkitachalapathy For R2 & R3 : Mr.S.P.Maharajan Special Government Pleader For R5 : Mr.S.Manohar ORDER (Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.) The prayer sought for in WMP(MD)No.29220 of 2025 is to implead the petitioner herein as one of the respondents in the main writ petition. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner herein would submit that in favour of the impleading petitioner, a contract has been awarded to construct a building in the temple premises which in fact, was sought to be cancelled, was the prayer asked for by the writ petitioner in the main 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WMP(MD)No.29220 of 2025 writ petition. Therefore, without hearing the present petitioner to get impleaded, if the main writ petition is decided, it will prejudice the interest of the present petitioner for implead and therefore, his petition has to be ordered, is his contention. 3. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 4. In view of the said factual position where the present petitioner is the contractor in whose favour, the contract has already been given, he becomes the necessary party to be heard. 5. Hence, this petition is ordered. Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments. [R.S.K., J.] & [P.V.M., J.] 17.04.2026 bala To
1. The District Collector, Thenkasi District, 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WMP(MD)No.29220 of 2025 Thenkasi. 2. The Tahsildar, Sankarankovil Taluk, Thenkasi District. 3. The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Thoothukudi. 4. The Executive Officer, A/m. Palvannanathar Swami Temple, Karivalamvanthanallur, Sankarankovil Taluk, Thenkasi District. 5. The Panchayat Secretary, Karivalamvanthanallur Panchayath, Sankarankovil Taluk, Thenkasi District.
4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WMP(MD)No.29220 of 2025 R.SURESH KUMAR
, J.
AND P.VADAMALAI, J. bala WMP(MD)No.29220 of 2025 17.04.2026 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis