APHC010492732025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25105/2025 Between: 1. SANIVARAPU VENKATA SIVA REDDY, S/0. LATE S SANKAR REDDY AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.1/397, COURT ROAD KOTI REDDY CIRCLE, NEXT TO MALABAR GOLD SHOWROOM CUDDAPAH 516002. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME (POLICE) DEPARTMENT ANDHRA PRADESH SECRETARIAT OFFICE, VELAGAPUDI, AMRAVATI. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALGIRI, AMARAVATHI. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, Y.S.R DISTRICT, KADAPA. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, I TOWN POLICE STATION, Y.S.R DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, I TOWN POLICE STATION, Y.S.R DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PAPUDIPPU SASHIDAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction declaring the inaction of the Respondents in calling me to the 5th respondent police station for the purpose of settlement of civil disputes at the behest of Kandula Raja Mohan Reddy as arbitrary, illegal and contrary to the well- established legal principles apart from being contrary to the provisions of the BNSS and provisions of constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondentsto call us to the police station and interfere with my life and liberty” 2 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:17.09.2025 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.25105 of 2025 Dt.17.09.2025 Asr