Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:45] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 327/2024 Krishan Gopal Sharma, And Others ----Petitioner Versus Union Of India and Others ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akshay Yadav for Mr. Bharat Yadav For Respondent(s) :
JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 02/01/2025
1. Matter comes up on misc. application No.327/2024 for clarification/modification of the order dated 01.05.2023 passed by this Court, while deciding S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6859/2019.
2. Counsel for the respondent submits that he has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent Nos.4 & 5 but due to typographical error his presence could not be marked in the order dated 01.05.2023. Counsel submits that his presence be marked in the aforesaid order.
3. Considering the arguments put forward by the learned counsel for the respondent and looking to the averments made in the application, the application stands allowed for the reasons stated therein.
4. Accordingly, presence of counsel for the respondent Nos. 4 & 5, Mr. Bharat Yadav, Adv. is marked on their behalf in the order dated 01.05.2023.
[2025:RJ-JP:45] (2 of 2) [WMAP-327/2024]
5. This order shall be treated as part and parcel of the order dated 01.05.2023.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J GARIMA/6