Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33050 (RAJ)

GHANSHYAM SINGHAL S/O SHRI SURAJ MAL SINGHAL v. SNG REAL ESTATE PVT.

CW/18898/2023 · 2025-03-24

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:13129] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18898/2023 1. Ghanshyam Singhal S/o Shri Suraj Mal Singhal, Aged About 71 Years, Resident Of Outside Of Surajpole Gate, Ganesh Bhawan, Before The New Anaaj Mandi, Jaipur. At Present Resides At Ist Floor, D-68, Near Police Memorial, Jln Road, Jaipur-302004 2. Pratibha Singhal W/o Shri Ghanshyam Singhal, Aged About 67 Years, Resident Of Outside Of Surajpole Gate, Ganesh Bhawan, Before The New Anaaj Mandi, Jaipur. At Present Resides At Ist Floor, D-68, Near Police Memorial, Jln Road, Jaipur-302004. ----Petitioners Versus SNG Real Estate Pvt., Having Registered Office At 707, Paris Point, Sawai Jai Singh Highway, Collectorate Circle, Banipark, Jaipur Through Its Director Satya Narayan Gupta Aged About 53 Years, Resident Of 1-E-19, Shiv Shakti Colony, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 24/03/2025 1. Instant writ petition was filed on 16.11.2023, questioning the order dated 29.10.2023 passed by the sole Arbitrator in arbitration proceedings Case No.1/2020 titled M/s SNG Real Estate Private Ltd. Vs. Ghanshyam Singhal & Anr. 2. Having perused the previous order-sheets, it appears that petitioner has asked adjournment three times and today also, no [2025:RJ-JP:13129] (2 of 2) [CW-18898/2023] one has put in appearance on behalf of petitioner to pursue the writ petition. 3. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the writ petition. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution. 5. Stay application and pending application, if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J TN/19