Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33043 (CHH)

SMT. MOUSAMI DAS v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/7213/2025 · 2025-07-07

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:31183 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7213 of 2025 1 - Smt. Mousami Das W/o Shri Sanju Das Aged About 41 Years Occupation Service Posted As Head Master R/o Main Road Chhotekapsi Post Chhotekapsi District North Bastar - Kanker (C.G.) 2 - Smt. Krishna Mahaldar W/o Shri Thakur Mahaldar Aged About 44 Years Occupation Service Posted As Head Master R/o House No. 47, A Shyama Palli Chhotekapsi District - North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) 3 - Smt. Manorama Sahu W/o Shri Baliram Sahu Aged About 42 Years Occupation Service Posted As Head Master R/o Ward No. 12 Majiyal Tamoda Kanker District - North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) 4 - Smt. Preeti Mankar W/o Shri Hemant Mankar Aged About 43 Years Occupation Service Posted As Head Master R/o House No 4, New Colony Chhotekapsi District - North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) 5 - Premdas Suryawanshi S/o Late Shri Piladas Suryawanshi Aged About 49 Years Occupation Service Posted As Teacher (L.B.) R/o Ward No. 6 Alor Kanker District - North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) 6 - Mangluram Dhruw S/o Shri Chamruram Dhruw Aged About 51 Years Occupation Service Posted As Head Master R/o Nayapara Sawer Bande District - North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) 7 - Uma Devi Rana S/o Shri Mehtap Singh Rana Aged About 46 Years Occupation Service Posted As Head Master R/o Sohgaon Kanker District - North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2025.07.08 15:06:23 +0530 2 8 - Smt. Usha Dhore W/o Shri Sanjay Kumar Dhore Aged About 46 Years Occupation Service Posted As Head Master R/o Sawer Nayapara Bande District - North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) 9 - Manoj Kundu S/o Shri Santosh Kundu Aged About 45 Years Occupation Service Posted As Head Master R/o P.V. 87 Bande District - North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) 10 - Smt. Bukeshwari Marshal W/o Shri Kamdev Marshal Aged About 41 Years Occupation Service Posted As Head Master R/o House No. 91 Bank Colony Pakhanjur District - North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) 11 - Padmini Khudshyam D/o Shri Lakshman Singh Khudshyam Aged About 45 Years Occupation Service Posted As Head Master R/o Ward No. 15, Ambedkar Ward Pakhanjur District - North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) 12 - Smt. Mamta Rani Haldar W/o Shri Jagdish Haldar Aged About 61 Years Occupation Service Posted As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) R/o Shripur Kanker District - North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur Revenue And Civil District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Secretary Panchayat And Rural Development Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur Revenue And Civil District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Director Directorate Public Isntruction Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 4 - District Education Officer Kanker District North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) 5 - Block Education Officer Koyalibeda District - North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) 6 - District Panchayat Kanker Through Its Chief Executive Officer District - North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) 7 - Janpad Panchayat Koyalibeda Through Its Chief Executive Officer District - North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) 3 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Patel, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mayur Khandelwal, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 08/07/2025 1. The claim of the petitioners in the present petition is with regard to grant of 1st and 2nd Kramonnati Vetanman. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that with regard to award of the 1st and 2nd Kramonnati Vetanman, some circular has been issued by the respondent/State. Apart from this, Division Bench of this Court in case of “Smt Sona Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh and others” in WA No. 261 of 2023 has also considered the identical issue. The petitioners are also entitled for the 1st and 2nd Kramonnati Vetanman. He further submits that at present, this petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to make a representation to respondents/ competent authority in light of order passed by this Court in WA No. 261 of 2023. 3. Learned State counsel opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. Be that as it may, looking to the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for petitioners, this petition, at this stage, is disposed of permitting the petitioners to make representation raising all grounds as raised in the writ petition to respondents/competent authority annexing all relevant documents, and judgment of this Court passed in WA No. 4 261 of 2023. On such representation being made, it is expected that the respondents/competent authority shall consider the same in accordance with law, considering the circular(s) issued in this regard, in light of judgment of this Court in WA No. 261 of 2023 within further period of four months from the date of receipt of such representation. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case, and it is for respondents/competent authority to consider the claim of petitioners on its own merits. 6. With this observation, the present writ petition stand disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge sagrika