Prabhu Yadav @ Prabhu Chaudhari @ Prabhu Ram v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./23702/2025 · 2025-05-05
Anshuman
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33040 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33040 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23702 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-209 Year-2022 Thana- GOPALPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Prabhu Yadav @ Prabhu Chaudhari @ Prabhu Ram Son of Nand Prasad Yadav @ Nand Prasad Chaudhari Village-Lachhpur, tola- Takiyabari, P.S. -Gopalpur, District- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raghav Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ramesh Chandra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 2 05-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Gopalpur P.S. Case No. 209 of 2022, registered on 07.10.2022, for the offences punishable under Sections 447, 323, 324, 325, 307, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against six named and some other unknown accused persons, including the petitioner, alleging that all the accused persons, in connivance with each other, reached the house of the informant with lathi, danda, bandook, farsa, talwaar, and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23702 of 2025(2) dt.05-05-2025 2/3 forcefully began constructing a house on the informant’s land. Upon resistance, they assaulted the informant’s side. The specific allegation against the present petitioner is that he snatched the gold chain of the informant, worth Rs. 40,000/- (Rupees Forty Thousand). 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel further submits that from the allegations made in the FIR, it becomes crystal clear that the dispute is related to land, and it has been alleged that the petitioner has constructed a house on the informant’s land. Counsel further submits that the persons against whom direct allegations are there have been granted bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court vide order dated 23.02.2024, passed in Cr. Misc. No. 11382 of 2024. Counsel also submits that the criminal antecedent of the petitioner is clean and he is ready to fulfill all the conditions whatsoever shall be imposed by this Hon’ble Court. 5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail. 6.
In the present facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Trial Court within a
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23702 of 2025(2) dt.05-05-2025 3/3 period of 4 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M.,-V, Gopalganj, in connection with Gopalpur P.S. Case No. 209 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
Aman Kumar/- (Dr. Anshuman, J.) U T