c IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. V. L. N. CHAKRAVARTHI I.A.Nos.1 & 3 of 2025 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.483 of 2025 CRIMINAL PETITION No.483 of 2025 Between: 1. Sunny Kiran, S/o. Krishna Rao, aged about 37 years, Occ; Doctor, Address 7-2-10/8, Sri Lakshmi Ganesh Nagar, Bairamalguda, K.V. Rangareddy, Telangana State - 500079. Presently residing at behind Timoshop, Wat Svay Village, Salakom Rerk Commune. Siemreapvince - 171204, Cambodia. Rep, by his Power of Attorney Holder, Marupudi Krishna Rao, S/o. Late Venkata Subbaiah, R/o.7-2-10/8, Sri Lakshmi Ganesh Nagar, Bairamalguda, K.V Rangareddy, Telangana State - 500079. 2. Marupudi Krishna Rao, S/o. Late Venkata Subbaiah, age 69 years, Occ: retired employee, R/o.7-2-10/8, Sri Lakshmi Ganesh Nagar, Bairamalguda, K.V. Rangareddy, Telangana State - 500079. 3. Marupudi Siva Parvathi, W/o. Krishna Rao, age 59 years Occ: House wife, R/o.7-2-10/8, Sri Lakshmi Ganesh Nagar, Bairamalguda, K.V. Rangareddy, Telangana State - 500079. 4. Nannapaneni Nageswara Rao, S/o. Ankineedu Chowdary, aged about 53 Software Engineer, R/o. Flat No.D-906, Apama Hillpark years, Occ: Lakebreeze, Survey No.274, PJR Road, Chandanagar, K.V.Rangareddy , Telangana - 500050. 5. Muppalla Hari Krishna, S/o. Sambasiva Rao, Aged about 47 years, Occ: Private employee, R/o. Plot No.63, S.S.Reddy Nagar, Almasguda K.V.Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh - 500058. ...Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 5 AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati. ...Respondent 2. Ponguluri Mounvika @ Marupudi Mounvika, W/o. Marupudi Sunny Kiran, aged about 30 years, Occ: House wife. Address 7-2-10/8, Sri Lakshmi Ganesh Nagar, Bairamalguda, K.V. Rangareddy, Telangana State - 500079. Presently residing at behind Timoshop, Wat Svay Village, Salakom Rerk Commune. Siemreapvince - 171204, Cambodia. Rep., by her paternal uncle and Power of Attorney, Nannapaneni Vijaya Kumar, S/o. Ankineedu, Age 49 years, Occ; Self Employee, R/o.Bodiplem Village, Kakumanu Mandal, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. ...Respondent/Defacto Complainant (R2 cause title is amended as per the Court Order dated 28.01.2025 in I.A.No.5 of 2025 in CRLP No.483 of 2025) Petition under Section 528 of BNSS Act (under Section 482 of Cr.P.C) praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise by considering the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), executed on 05-12- 2024 at Hyderabad and quash the FIR.No.112 of 2022 on the file of Kakumanu Police Station, Guntur District, registered against the petitioners U/s 498-A of IPC and Section 3 & 4 of DP Act. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2025 Between: Ponguluri Mounvika @ Marupudi Mounvika, W/o. Marupudi Sunny Kiran, aged about 30 years. Occ: House wife. Address 7-2-10/8, Sri Lakshmi Ganesh Nagar, Bairamalguda, K.V. Rangareddy, Telangana State - 500079. Presently residing at behind Timoshop, Wat Svay Village, Salakom Rerk Commune. Siemreapvince - 171204, Cambodia. Rep., by her paternal uncle and Power of Attorney, Nannapaneni Vijaya Kumar, S/o. Ankineedu, Age 49 years, Occ: Self Employee, R/o.Bodiplem Village, Kakumanu Mandal, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. ...Petitioner/Defacto Complainant AND 1. Marupudi Sunny Kiran, S/o. Krishna Rao, aged about 37 years, Occ: Doctor, Address 7-2-10/8, Sri Lakshmi Ganesh Nagar, Bairamalguda, K.V. Rangareddy, Telangana State - 500079. Presently residing at behind Timoshop, Wat Svay Village, Salakom Rerk Commune. Siemreapvince - 171204, Cambodia. Rep, by his Power of Attorney Holder, Marupudi Krishna Rao, S/o. Late Venkata Subbaiah, R/o.7-2-10/8, Sri Lakshmi Ganesh Nagar, Bairamalguda, K.V Rangareddy, Telangana State - 500079. 2. Marupudi Krishna Rao, S/o. Late Venkata Subbaiah, age 69 years, Occ: retired employee, R/o.7-2-10/8, Sri Lakshmi Ganesh Nagar, Bairamalguda, K.V. Rangareddy, Telangana State - 500079. 3. Marupudi Siva Parvathi, W/o. Krishna Rao, age 59 years Occ: House wife, R/o.7-2-10/8, Sri Lakshmi Ganesh Nagar, Bairamalguda, K.V. Rangareddy, Telangana State - 500079. 4. Nannapaneni Nageswara Rao, S/o. Ankineedu Chowdary, aged about 53 Software Engineer, R/o. Flat No.D-906, Apama Hillpark Lakebreeze, Survey No.274, PJR Road, Chandanagar, K.V.Rangareddy , Telangana - 500050. years, Occ; 5. Muppalla Hari Krishna, S/o. Sambasiva Rao, Aged about 47 years, Occ; Private employee, R/o. Plot No.63, S.S.Reddy Nagar, Almasguda K.V.Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh - 500058. ... Respondents/Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 5 6. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati. ...Respondent Petition under Section 360 R/w 528 of BNSS Act (under Section 320(6) R/w 482 of Cr.P.C) praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the parties to compound the case in Crime No. 112 of 2022, dt 11-10- 2022, registered for the offences under Section 498-A and Section 3 and 4 of DPAct., on the file of Kakumanu Police Station, Guntur District., and record the compromise by considering the Memorandum of Understanding (MCU). executed on 05-12-2024 at Hyderabad. I.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Between: Ponguluri Mounvika @ Marupudi Mounvika, W/o. Marupudi Sunny Kiran, aged about 30 years, Occ: House wife. Address 7-2-10/8, Sri Lakshmi Ganesh Nagar, Bairamalguda, K.V. Rangareddy, Telangana State - 500079. Presently residing at behind Timoshop, Wat Svay Village, Salakom Rerk Commune. Siemreapvince - 171204, Cambodia. Rep., by r- her paternal uncle and Power of Attorney, Nannapaneni Vijaya Kumar^ S/o. Ankineedu, Age 49 years, Occ: Self Employee, R/o.Bodiplem Village, Kakumanu Mandal, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. ...Petitioner/Defacto Complainant AND 1. Marupudi Sunny Kiran, S/o. Krishna Rao, aged about 37 years, Occ: Doctor, Address 7-2-10/8, Sri Lakshmi Ganesh Nagar, Bairamalguda, K.V. Rangareddy, Telangana State - 500079. Presently residing at behind Timoshop, Wat Svay Village, Salakom Rerk Commune. Siemreapvince - 171204, Cambodia. Rep, by his Power of Attorney Holder, Marupudi Krishna Rao, S/o. Late Venkata Subbaiah, R/o.7-2-10/8, Sri Lakshmi Ganesh Nagar, Bairamalguda, K.V Rangareddy, Telangana State - 500079. 2. Marupudi Krishna Rao, S/o. Late Venkata Subbaiah, age 69 years, Occ: retired employee, R/o.7-2-10/8, Sri Lakshmi Ganesh Nagar, Bairamalguda, K.V. Rangareddy, Telangana State - 500079. 3. Marupudi Siva Parvathi, W/o. Krishna Rao, age 59 years Occ: House wife, R/O.7-2-10/8, Sri Lakshmi Ganesh Nagar, Bairamalguda, K.V. Rangareddy, Telangana State - 500079. 4. Nannapaneni Nageswara Rao, S/o. Ankineedu Chowdary, aged about 53 years, Occ: Software Engineer, R/o. Flat No.D-906, Apama Hillpark Lakebreeze, Survey No.274, PJR Road, Chandanagar, K.V.Rangareddy , Telangana - 500050. 5. Muppalla Hah Krishna, S/o. Sambasiva Rao, Aged about 47 years, Occ: Private employee, R/o. Plot No.63, S.S.Reddy Nagar, Almasguda K.V.Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh - 500058. ... Respondents/Petitioners/AccusedNos.1 to 5 6. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati. ...Respondent Petition under Section 360 R/w 528 of BNSS Act (under Section 320(2) R/w 482 of Cr.P.C) praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the parties to compound the case in Crime No.112 of 2022, dated 11-10-2022, registered for the offences under Section 498-A and Section 3 & 4 of DPAct, on the file of Kakumanu Police Station, Guntur District, and record the compromise by considering the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). executed on 05-12-2024 at Hyderabad. I.A. NO: 4 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS Act (under Section 482 of Cr.P.C) praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 5 in FIR.No.112 of 2022 on the file of Kakumanu Police Station, Guntur District, pending disposal of the criminal petition. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V V Lakshmi Narayana, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Smt P. Namratha Choudary, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: APHC010015032025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 483 of 2025 Between: ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED{S) Marupudi Sunny Kiran and Others AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) and Others Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1 .V V LAKSHMI NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1.NAMRATHA CHOUDARY P 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following order: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI lA Nos.1 and 3 OF 2025 in/and Criminal Petition No:483 OF 2025 COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition, under Section 482 Cr.P.C., has been filed on behalf bf the petitioners herein/AI to A5, to quash the proceedings in F.l.R No.112 of 2022 of Kakumanu Police Station, Guntur District registered for the offences punishable under Section 498A IPC and Sections 3 aiid 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. Today, when the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the petitioners herein/Accused, learned counsel for the 2""^ respondent/de facto complainant, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the State are present before this Court. The de facto complainant and A1 appeared through Video Conference and A2 to A5 present before this Court physically. All the parties produced their respective Aadhar cards in proof of their identity. Learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for 2^^Tgspondent identified their parties in the open Court. The concerned police officer is present before this Court and identified the parties. 2. This Court questioned the 2^^^ respondent/de facto complainant with regard to compromise, and she categorically stated to the extent 3. that she has voluntarily entered into compromise with the petitioners pg I 3 herein/Accused and there is no threat, coercion or undue influence in arriving at the compromise. This Court is satisfied with the identification of the parties and voluntariness in arriving at the compromise. In view of the compromise between the parties, the chances of conviction remote and bleak. are 4. The Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh v. State of Punjab & another,^ held at paragraph No.57, as under; "The position that emerges from the above discussion can be summarized thus: the power of the High Court in quashing a criminal proceeding or FIR or complaint in exercise of its inherent Jurisdiction is distinct and different from the power given to a criminal court for compounding the offences Under Section 320 of the Code. Inherent power is of wide plenitude with no statutory limitation but it has to be exercised in accord with the guideline engrafted in such power viz; (i) to secure the ends of Justice or (ii) to prevent abuse of the process of any Court. In what cases power to quash the criminal proceeding or complaint or F.I.R may be exercised where the offender and victim have settled their dispute would depend on the facts and circumstances of each case and no category can be prescribed. However, before exercise of such power, the High Court must have due regard to the nature and gravity of the crime. Heinous and serious offences of mental depravity or offences like murder, rape, dacoity, etc. cannot be fittingly quashed even though the victim or victim's family and the offender have settled the dispute. Such offences are 2012 (9) Scale 257 4 not private in nature and have serious impact on society. Similarly, any compromise between the victim and offender in relation to the offences under special statutes like Prevention of Corruption Act or the offences committed by public servants while working in that capacity etc; cannot provide for any basis for quashing criminal proceedings involving such offences. But the criminal cases having overwhelmingly and pre-dominatingly civil favour stand on different footing for the purposes of quashing, particularly the offences arising from commercial, financial, mercantile, civil, partnership or such like transactions or the offences arising out of matrimony relating to dowry, etc. or the family disputes where the wrong is basically private or personal in nature and the parties have resolved their entire dispute. In this category of cases. High Court may quash criminal proceedings if in its view, because of the compromise between the offender and victim, the possibility of conviction is remote and bleak and continuation of criminal case would put accused to great oppression and prejudice and extreme injustice would be caused to him by not quashing the criminal case despite full and complete settlement and compromise with the victim. In other words, the High Court must consider whether it would be unfair or contrary to the interest ofjustice to continue with the criminal proceeding or continuation of the criminal proceeding would tantamount to abuse of process of law despite settlement and compromise between the victim and wrongdoer and whether to secure the ends of justice, it is appropriate that criminal case is put to an end and if the answer to the above question(s) is in affirmative, the High Court shall be well within its jurisdiction to quash the criminal proceeding. ” / V. 5 5. In view of the aforesaid decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court, and as the parties have entered into a compromise, and compounded the offences, this Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in F.I.R No.112 of 2022 of Kakumanu Police Station, Guntur District is hereby quashed. 6. Accordingly, I.A.Nos.1 and 3 of 2025 and Criminal Petition No.483 of 2025 are allowed. As a sequel thereto, the interlocutory applications, if pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed. any. . s V Sd/- P. VINOD KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR I //TRUE COPY// SEC To 1. The Station House Officer, Kakumanu Police Station, Guntur District. 2. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravathi[OUT] 3. One CC to Sri V. V. Lakshmi Narayana, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Smt. P. Namratha Choudary, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Three CD Copies TK *along with the Joint Compromise Memo in I.A.No.3 of 2025 in CRLP No.483 of 2025 HIGH COURT TK DATED:28/01/2025 COMMON ORDER I.A.Nos.1 & 3 of 2025 in/and CRLP.No.483 of 2025 Jfof AND/y;q^ OV 15 FEB 2025 Hi o Co/ ^ . Current Section . ALLOWING THE I.A.Nos.1 & 3 of 2025 AND ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL PETITION IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI Criminal Petition No. of 2025 Between: 1. Marupudi Sunny Kiran, S/o. Krishna Rao, aged about 37 years, Occ: Doctor, Address: 7-2-10/8, Sri Lakshmi Ganesh Nagar, Bairamalguda, K.V. Rangareddy, Telangana State - 500079. Presently residing at behind Timoshop, Wat Svay Village, Salakom Rerk Commune. Siemreapvince-171204, Cambodia. Rep, by his Power of Attorney Holder, Marupudi Krishna Rao, S/o. Late Venkata Subbaiah R/o 7-2-10/8, Sri Lakshmi Ganesh Nagar, Bairamalguda, K.V Rangareddy, Telangana State - 500079. 2. Marupudi Krishna Rao, S/o. Late Venkata Subbaiah, age 69 years, Occ: retired employee, R/o 7-2-10/8, Sri Lakshmi Ganesh Nagar, Bairamalguda, K.V Rangareddy, Telangana State - 500079. 3. Marupudi Siva Parvathi, W/o. Krishna Rao, age 59 years, Occ: House wife, R/o 7-2-10/8, i- r' Sri Lakshmi Ganesh Nagar, Bairamalguda, K.V Rangareddy, Telangana State - 500079. 4. Nannapaneni Nageswara Rao, S/o. Ankineedu Chowdary, aged about 53 years, Occ: Software Engineer, R/o. Flat No.D-906, Apama Hillpark Lakebreeze, Survey No.274, PJR Road, Chandanagar, Chandanagar, K.V.Rangareddy, Telangana - 500050. 5. Muppalla Hari Krishna, S/o. Sambasiva Rao, Aged about 47 years, Occ: Private employee, R/o. Plot no.63,S.S.Reddy Nagar, Almasguda, K.V.Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh - 500058. ...Petitioners/Accused Nos.AI toA5 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati. 1. ...Respondent IP 2. Ponguluri Mounika @ Marupudi Mounika, S/o Sunny Kiran, aged about 30 years, Occ; House wife, Address; 7-2-10/8, Sri Lakshmi Ganesh Nagar, Bairamalguda, K.V. Rangareddy, Telangana State - 500079. Presently residing at behind Timoshop, Wat Svay Village, Salakom Rerk Commune. Siemreapvince - 171204, Cambodia. Rep., by her paternal uncle and Power of Attorney, Nannapaneni Vijaya Kumar, S/o. Ankineedu, Age 49 years, Occ: Self Employee, R/o Bodiplem Village, Kakumanu Mandal, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh ...Respondent/Defacto Complainant JOINT MEMO 1. It is respectfully submitted that on 11-10-2022, the Station House Officer, • Kakumanu P.S. based on the report of one Sri. Marupudi Mpunika, W/o Sunny Kiran (2"'* respondent herein), a crime was registered against the for the offences punishable under sections 498-A of IPC and petitioners Section 3 & 4 of DP Act. It is submitted that 1"‘ petitioner is the husband of the 2"'^ respondent and the petitioner nos.2 and 3 are in laws of the 2"'* respondent and 4‘^ and 5^*^ petitioners are knowing persons to the both families. It is submitted that petitioner Nos.1 to 3 are native of Chintalapudi Village at present they are residing at above stated address stated in title and further stated that presently-the petitioner No.1 and 2^^ respondent residing at Cambodia and lived together and lead matrimonial life in that place. The 1®‘ petitioner was left from India to Germany for his further studies pursue his medical post graduation related to Orthopedic in the year 2015 and at present he took a break,for:his post graduation in Germany and he is on a business trip in Cambodia with his wife who is the 2"*^ respondent cause to herein. „-n,. 2. It is respectfully submitted that as per the prosecution the complainant is resident of Bodipalem Village, Kakumanu Mandal, Guntur District. The incident occurred prior to 22-08-2'022 and reported in the police station on 11-10-2022. The averments of the complainant is that, the marriage of the \ V; A '• 1 >V' ! complainant was performed on 18-12-2020 with Marupudi Sunny Kiran, S/o. Krishna Rao of Chintalapudi Village as per the traditions and spend Rs. 10,00,000/- for perming the marriage at Sri. Dhulipalla Veerayya Chowdary Function Hall. It is also stated tha^tlie accused didn’t asked for any dowry and only said to spent for the marriage expenses. It is further stated that, A1 is working as Orthopaedic Doctor-in Germany, and her in laws residing at Hyderabad. After the marriage complainant was shifted to Hyderabad for After that the Accused A1. Maurpudi Sunny Kiran, S/o. matrimonial life. Krishna Rao, A2. Marupudi Krishna Rao, A3. Marupudi Sivaparvathi of harassed the several time for want of Rs. Chintalapudi village now residing at Hyderabad were complainant mentally and physically in but the parents of, the complainant unable to give to the Then the elders AA. Nannapaneni Nageswara Rao, A5. Hah 20,00.000/-, accused. Krishna are support to the accused.and demanded to give additional dowry 16-07-2022 at about 11 PM. the Accused No.1 to the accused. On quarrelling with her in phone then the accused A3 forced her to sign on four and locked her in aioom. It is further stated that, on 22-08- white papers 2022, the parents of the complainant came to her and brought to her parental house. respectfully submitted that pehding the investigation in the above said intervention of the well-wishers on both sides the petitioners amicable settlement thereby a 3. It is crime, due to and respondent No.2 have come to an Memorandum of Understanding'(MOU) is made and executed on 05-12- 2024 at Hyderabad between the i®* petitioner and 2"*^ respondent herein, who are wife and husband. Keeping in view of welfare of both sides and also to avoid evil atmosphere, because both the petitioners No.1 to 3 are family members and further the petitioner Nos.4 and 5 are elders and knowing persons to the both parties as per the said MOU, the respondent No.2 has agreed to withdraw the case against the petitioners in the court of law and including this present FIR No.112 of 2022, of PS Kakumanu, It inLokAdalat is further submitted that as per the Memorandum of Understanding where it has stated that 1" petitioner and 2"“ respondent are living together happily "V. -tx. for more than 3 months prior to date of MOU, They also agreed to take steps for getting the aforesaid case-to withdrawal against the petitioners, thereby criminal petition filed seeking for the quash the case against the submitted that the 1®‘ petitioner and 2"^^ respondent are living the present petitioner. It is at Cambodia and live to marital life happily. In view of 2^ respondent herein executed a Power of together and residing that the petitioner and Attorneys on 14.12.2024, accordingly this present petition is filed through their Power of Attorneys as stated above in comply the terms as mentioned in the MOU dated 05.12.2024"iys submitted that the petitioner No.1 and 2"*^ respondent could not present physically in the court of law by reason that at present they are residing at Cambodia and it is further submitted that they are ready and very much wilting to present before this Hon’ble Court through Video conference (Virtually) in the above said case for that along with this petitioner and 2!^ respondent filed permission petition through of Attorneys before this Hon’ble Court with a prayer please to petition the 1 their Power permit the 1®‘ petitioner and 2"^^ respondent appear before this Hon’ble Court through Video Conference. 4. 4. It is respectfully submitted tbahas already stated above the respondent No.2 has no grievance or complaint against the petitioners in view of the aforesaid compromise and no purpose wduld be served if the case is proceed against the petitioners. Hence this Joint Memo. ?V.' submitted, that, the petitioner no.l/Accused No.1 is 5. It is respectfully represented by Power of Attorney, who is the father of A1, Mr. Marupudi Krishna Rao, S/o. Late Venkata Subbaiah, R/o. 7-2-10/8, Sri Lakshmi Ganesh Nagar, Bairamalgiida, K.V.Rangareddy - 500079, Telangana. And the De-facto complainant is represented her Power of Attorney, who is paternal uncle of de-facto cqmplainant/2'^ respondent, Mr. Nannapaneni AnkirtSdu: R/o. 3-91, Bodipalem village, Kakumanu Vijaya Kumar, S/o. .--i Mandal, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh - 522315. 1 .'f 12 The matter has been settled between the parties out of the court in the interest of both families and to avoid litigations, the defacto complainant has also agreed to withdraw the present case i.e., Crime No. 112 of 2022, in view of the compromise as per the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), executed on 05-12-2024 at Hyderabad. The 2^ respondent being a defacto complainant in Crime No.112 of 2022, dt:11-10-2022, registered for the offences under Section 498-A and Section 3 & 4 of DP Act, on the file of Kakumanu Police Station, Guntur District., is not interested to prosecute the petitioners/Accused. The defacto complainant herein has no objection to Quash in Crime No.112 of 2022, dt:11-10-2022, registered for the offences under Section 498-A and Section 3 & 4 of DP Act., on the file of Kakumanu Police Station, Guntur District. Hence, this Memo. De-facto Complainant/Respondent N'o.2 Power of Attorney Holder • y' Petitioner No.l/AI, Power of Attorney Holder Peiitioner No.2/A2 \J- ,, Petitioner No.3/A3 f ckixSoxy ■ P Petitioner No.4/A4 Petitioner No.5/A5 Date: 08-01-2025 Place; Guntur