Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33039 (AP)

R.Rajendran v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/23200/2018 · 2025-03-25

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010491862018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23200/2018 Between: R.Rajendran ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. L J VEERA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR COOPERATION (AP) The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23200/2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents particularly the 3rd respondent in passing the resolution-1 dated 24.01.2018 removing the petitioner from the post of CEO of 3rd respondent society without jurisdiction, without any notice, without enquiry and without following any procedure as per the service conditions as illegal, unjust, arbitrary, without any basis or substance, highhanded, mala fide, motivated and against statutory provisions and consequently set aside the resolution-1 dated 24.01.2018 passed by the 3rd respondent society in so far as the petitioner is concerned and pass…” 2. Heard Sri Ranganadha Rao, learned Counsel representing Sri L.J.Veera Reddy, learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Sri A.Krishna Kishore, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Co-operation for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. 3. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the respondent- authorities have complied with the interim orders passed by this Court vide orders dated 16.07.2018 in I.A.No. 01 of 2018. Learned Counsel would further submit that the petition may be disposed of recording the same. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 would submit that the petition may be disposed of recording the same. 3 5. In the light of representations made by the learned Counsel on both sides, the Writ Petition is disposed of making the interim Order as absolute. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________________ Dr. VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 25.03.2025 UPS 4 29 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.23200 of 2018 Dated.25.03.2025 UPS