SUBHASH CHANDRA AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/20117/2023 · 2025-09-22
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33037 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33037 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 20117 of 2023 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. Sri Amar Singh Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioners states that the matter has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous.
2. In view of statement so made, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. September 23, 2025 V.S.Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amar Singh Yadav, Manoj Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C. (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Subhash Chandra And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad