Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33034 (AP)

Kalyanapuram Venkata Ramana v. The National Highways Authority of India,

WP/27730/2024 · 2025-01-02

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAV (Special Original Jurisdiction) a [k THURSDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY (fc TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 27730 OF 2024 Between; Kalyanapuram Venkata Ramana, S/o. K.Srinivasa Ayyangar, aged about 63 Years, R/o. Flat No.202, Swathi Apartment, 2nd floor Bagyanagar Colony, Kukatpally, Hyderabad-500072, Medchal- Malkajigiri District, Telangana State. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The National Highways Authority of India, Rep. by its Chairman, G 5 and 6, Sector-10, Dwaraka, New Delhi 2. The Project Director, The National Highways Authority of India, Ananthapur, Ananthapur District 3. The District Collector, Ananthapur District, Ananthapur 4. The Joint Collector/CALA(NH Act, 1956), Ananthapur District, Ananthapur 5. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ananthapur, Ananthapur District 6. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (LA) Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature Writ of Mandamus, declaring the impugned paper award vide Award No.26 of 2018, dated 24.10.2018 and Award No.27 of 2019, dated 10.06.2019 respectively passed by the 4^^ respondent in respect of the petitioner land to an extent of Ac.0.50 cents in Survey No.887-B #6 887-C of Tadipatri Village of Tadipatri Mandal, Anantapur District, without depositing the compensation as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to section 3 A to 3H of National High ways Act, 1956, contrary to Articles 14,19,21 and 300- A of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the aforesaid impugned Award No.26 of 2018, dated 24.10.2018 85 Award No.27 of 2019, dated 10.06.2019 respectively passed by the 4th respondent in so far as petitioner is concerned. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of dispossession of the petitioner from his land to an extent of Ac.0.50 cents in Survey No.887-B ^s^87-C of Tadipatri Village of Tadipatri Mandal, Anantapur District, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner(s): SRI. SHAIK MOHAMMED ISMAIL Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2; CHAUDHARY AND CHAUDHARY ADVOCATES AND SOLICITORS LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 to 6: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER 1 [3328] APHC010491862024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 27730/2024 Between: 1.KALYANAPURAM VENKATA RAMANA, S/0. K.SRINIVASA AYYANGAR, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/0. FLAT NO.202, SWATHI APARTMENT, 2ND FLOOR BAGYANAGAR COLONY, KUKATPALLY, HYDERABAD-500072 TELANGANA STATE. MEDCHAL-MALKAJIGIRI DISTRICT, ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, G 5 AND 6, SECTOR-10, DWARAKA, NEW DELHI 1 2.THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT 7 ) 3.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, ANANTHAPUR 4.THE JOINT COLLECTOR/CALANH ACT 1956, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, ANANTHAPUR 5.THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ANANTHAPUR ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT 6.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE (LA) DEPARTMENT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT PRINCIPAL SECRETARIAT, 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner; 1.SHAIK MOHAMMED ISMAIL Counsel for the Respondent{S); 1 .CHAUDHARY AND CHAUDHARY ADVOCATES AND SOLICITORS LAW FIRM 2.GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following; ORAL ORDER; Sri Shaik Mohammed Ismail, learned Counsel Petitioner submits that he has filed a letter in the Registry on 30.12.2024 seeking to withdraw this Writ Petition. This letter is taken on record. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as Withdrawn. No order as to 2. costs Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. 3. Sd/- N. NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri. Shaik Mohammed Ismail, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to M/S Chaudhary And Chaudhary Advocates And Solicitors Law Firm, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to GP For Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT]. 4. Three CD Copies AL HIGH COURT DATED:02/01/2025 ORDER SO’’ 0^ g 0 3 JAN 2025 . Current Section . ^ WP.No.27730 of 2024 DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS