1 2025:CGHC:31772 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 3511 of 2025 1 - Upendra Nath Chandra (Petitioner in Person) Bhagwat Prasad Chandra Aged About 38 Years Resident Of Village Kataud P.S. Dabhra District Sakti (C.G.) 2 - Dhruvi Chandra Daughter Of Upendra Nath Chandra Aged About 5 Years Resident Of Village Kataud P.S. Dabhra District Sakti (C.G.) Minor Through Legal Guardian Father Upendra Nath Chandra Son Of Bhagwat Prasad Chandra Aged About 38 Years Resident Of Villgae Kataud P.S. Dabhra District Sakti (C.G.) 3 - Daughter Of Upendra Nath Chandra Chitra Chandra Aged About 3 Years Resdent Of Village Kataud P..S. Dabhra District Sakti (C.G) Minor Through Legal Guardian Father Upendra Nath Chandra Son Of Bhagwat Prasad Chandra Aged About 38 Years Resident Of Village Kataud P.S Dabhra District Sakti (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Finance Department Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar Mantralaya Raipur Civil And Revenue District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through It's Secretary Home Affairs Department C3 Civil Line Mantralaya Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Union Of India Through Central Registrar Of Cooperative Society Ministry Of Cooperation 900, 9th Floor Tower E, Word Trade Center Narouji Nagar New Delhi 110029 ---- Respondents VASANT KUMAR Digitally signed by VASANT KUMAR Date: 2025.07.09 17:11:57 +0530 2 For Petitioner : Mr. Upendra Nath Chandra, in person For State : Mr. R.S. Marhas, Additional AG assisted by Mr. Satish Gupta, GA For Union of India : Mr. Niraj Baghel, CGC on behalf of Mr. Ramakant Mishra, DSGI Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 09/07/2025 Heard. 1. The petitioner has been filed this writ petition on the following relief(s) : “(i) That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for entire record from the respondent authorities, in the interest of justice. (ii) That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to provide fund to the petitioners to organize/program at whole places of Chhattisgarh State with protection, in the interest of justice. (iii) For surveillance, it is necessary for all citizens of India transparency accountability and provision of responsibility and punishment. Today, citizens and institutions, that are private or government, will have to perform their duties for the organization similar to 3 the duties for the country then no anti-national activity can take place. (iv) That I and my family can be killed at any time by white collar criminals, so it is extremely important to provide immediate security. (v) That, Petitioners 2 and 3 fees and other resources for their education can be provided immediately. (vi) For me and my family to survive, immediate arrangement of business or job is necessary. Because all opportunities of employment have been blocked by white collar criminals. Because the government departments have directly or indirectly helped the white collar criminals. (vii) It is necessary to fix a time limit for the fair disposal of all applications. And it is very important to have an easy and single medium for justice. So that the innocent get justice on time and people's faith in the court remains intact. The most important thing is that the criminals should be afraid of committing crimes. (viii) This matter is worth pursuing here because proper action has not been taken on all the applications. All the fundamental rights of me and my family are being violated. But today we have reached a dying situation. Before dying, I am pleading for justice for the last time in the High Court of Chhattisgarh. 4 (ix) There is a need to know every day on the day of hearing of this case as was done by the Supreme Court in the Waqf Bill 2025 Amendment Act. (x) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief(s), which is deemed fit and proper in the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. Mr. Upendra Nath Chandra (Petitioner in person) contended that he is facing financial hardship, therefore, he is not able to deposit the security amount. 3. Learned State Counsel has raised objection on the submission made by the petitioner. 4. I have heard the submission made by the petitioner as well as by the learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, further considering the order dated 30.06.2025 passed in WP(PIL) No.59 of 2025 by the Division Bench of this Court. In para – 4 of the said order it is stated that :- “In view of the submission made by the petitioner in person, the present petition is dismissed with a 5 liberty to the petitioner to file afresh petition after depositing the security amount, as per rules.” 6. As per the aforesaid order, the petitioner was directed to deposit the security amount, but he has not deposited the said amount yet. 7. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed with a liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition after compliance of order dated 30.06.2025 passed in WP(PIL) No.59/2025 by the Division Bench of this Court. 8. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Vasant