1 APHC010492192016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 36282/2016 Between: G.bhaskara Rao ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V S K RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. CHINTAPALLI SRINIVAS 2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) 3. ELEVATED AS JUDGE The Court Made the Following Order:- This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: “to issue a Writ Order or Direction particularly a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in issuing the notice in Rc.No.B2/2387/2016 dated 28.08.2016 as illegal arbitrary contrary to the Rule 43 of 2 the Rules framed in G.O.MS.No.888, Revenue Endowments Department dated 08.12.2000 Act NO. 4/2014 published in Government Gazette on 27.06.2014 and contrary to the interim orders passed in W.A.N0.503, 506, 507, 508 and 554 of 2016 and batch consequently set-aside the same and direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in service till he completes the age of 60 years with all consequential benefits and to pass...” 2. Sri V.S.K.Rama Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in view of the subsequent events taken place in the lis, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no orders as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J 11.07.2025. ASR 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO.36282 of 2016 11.07.2025 ASR