IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 20248 of 2025 Decided on: 23.12.2025. Manjeet Singh and others …Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & another .…Respondents. ……………………………………………………………………………. Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? ……………………………………………………………………………… For the petitioners: Mr. L.S. Mehta and Mr. Ranbir Singh, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge Notice. Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 3. Petitioners’ grievances are that their representation dated 16.11.2025 (Annexure P-3) seeking applicability of Mohit Sharma & Anr. Versus State of H.P. & Ors, CWP No.1638 of 2024, decided on 29.11.2024, has not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 decide the aforesaid representation in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer. 4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioners dated 16.11.2025 (Annexure P-3) in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment in the case of Mohit Sharma within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioners. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Sushil Kukreja) Judge December 23, 2025(yogesh)