1 2025:CGHC:2405 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 279 of 2025 Balaram Sinha S/o Shambhuram Sinha Aged About 62 Years R/o Village Karkabhat, Post Sorar, Tehsil Balod, District Balod (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Chief Secretary, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur Dist.-Raipur (C.G.) 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary General Administration Department, Matralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur Dist. Raipur (C.G.) 3 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Water Resource Department, Matralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur Dist. Raipur (C.G.) 4 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Finance , Accounts And Treasury, Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Matralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur Dist. Raipur (C.G.) 5 - The Assistant Director Hydro Metrology Department, Division 04, Raipur, Dist. Raipur (C.G.) ----Respondents GOURI MUDALIAR Digitally signed by GOURI MUDALIAR Date: 2025.01.15 20:03:00 +0530 2 For Petitioner : Shri Anand Kumar Kujur, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Shri Suyashdhar Badgaiya, Dy.G.A. Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 15/01/2025 1. Heard Shri Anand Kumar Kujur, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Suyashdhar Badgaiya, learned Dy.G.A. appearing for the State/respondents. 2. By filing this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for following relief(s):- “(i)That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for all the records pertaining to the case. (ii) That, this Honble Court may kindly be pleased to issue writ/order/ direction to the respondent authorities to grant the benefits of leave encashment to work charged and contingency employees on their retirement in accordance with the statutory rules, regulations and circulars issued by the respondent authorities and also based on the judgment passed by this Hon'ble Court on 30.09.2022, in WPS No. 3870/2021. (iii) That, this Honble Court may kindly be pleased to issue writ/order/ direction to the respondent authorities to take appropriate decision within a reasonable period of time on the requests and representations preferred by the petitioners in accordance with the law and also based on the judgment 3 passed by this Honble Court on 30.09.2022, in WPS No. 3870/2021 to grant the benefits of leave encashment to work charged and contingency employees on their retirement. (iv) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue writ/order/direction similar to the order passed in WPS No. 3732/2023 passed on 06.07.2023 to the respondent authorities to immediately process the claim of all similarly placed persons in the light of the aforesaid decision of this High Court on the same subject-matter, within an outer limit of 120 days from the date of the receipt of the copy of the order. (v) That any other relief/ order which may be deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be granted.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is retired employee of the respondent department, who was work charged employee working in Water Resource Department. He submits that in the light of judgment passed by this Court in Writ Petition (S) No.3870 of 2021 (Faguvaram Patel & Ors. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors.) and other connected matters decided on 30.09.2022, the petitioner is entitled for leave encashment. 4. Learned State counsel submits that sufficient documents have not been filed by the petitioner and it is also not reflected as to whether the petitioner has completed the minimum period of service to avail the benefit of leave encashment. 5. I have heard learned counsel for parties and perused the documents available in record. 4 6. Be that as it may, without commenting anything on the merits, this writ petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to make detailed representation before the concerned respondent/competent authority within the period of ‘30 days’ from the date of receipt of copy of this order with all necessary documents to substantiate his claim. In the event of filing of representation, on due verification, if the petitioner is found to be similarly situated persons, as in the case of Faguvaram Patel (surpa), his claim shall be decided by the respondents in light of judgment of Faguvaram Patel (Supra) expeditiously preferably within the period of ‘90 days’ from the date of submission of the said representation. 7. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of with aforesaid observations and directions. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad ) Judge gouri