1 2025:CGHC:37392 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7502 of 2025 1 - Rashmi Gupta D/o Ganpat Prasad Gupta Aged About 32 Years Presently Posted As Lecturer (Commerce) Government Higher Secondary School, Champa, District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara, C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur, District Raipur, C.G. 2 - The Director Directorate Of Public Instruction C-Block, First Floor, Indravati Bhawan, Nawa Raipur Atal Nagar, District- Raipur, C.G. 3 - The District Collector- Ambikapur District- Surguja, C.G. 4 - District Education Officer And Secretary District Level Yuktiyuktikaran Samiti, District- Surguja, C.G. 5 - Block Education Officer Lakhanpur, District- Surguja, C.G. 6 - Principal Government Girls Higher Secondary School, Lakhanpur, District- Surguja, C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vivekanand Samaddar, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 30/07/2025 1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 12.06.2025, whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Govt. Girls Higher Secondary ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2025.09.03 19:54:03 +0530 2 School, Lakhanpur, District Surguja to Govt. Higher Secondary School, Champa, District Balodabazar, under the rationalization instructions. 2. The counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the petitioner has joined but still she wants to make her fresh representation. He would further submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner vide notification dated 07.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue his/her representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law in an objective manner by passing reasoned order as early as possible. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Alok