- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:12816 RFA No. 1982 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1982 OF 2023 (DEC) BETWEEN: AADHYA D/O K. P. PRASHANTH AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, NO.1578/A, 25TH CROSS, 30TH MAIN, BANASHANKARI II STAGE, BENGALURU – 560 070. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. ANIL KUMAR S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE CHAIRMAN CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION HEAD OFFICE, SHIKSHA KENDRA-2, COMMUNITY CENTRE, PREET VIHAR, DELHI – 110 092. 2. THE SECRETARY THE PRE-UNIVERSITY EDUCATION BOARD, GOVT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU – 560 001. 3. THE REGIONAL OFFICER DEGREE COLLEGE BUILDING NO.57, HESARGHATTA MAIN ROAD, NEAR SAPTHAGIRI HOSPITAL, CHIMNEY HILLS, CHIKKABANAVARA, BENGALURU - 560 090. Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:12816 RFA No. 1982 of 2023 4. THE PRINCIPAL ST. JOSEPH,S COLLEGE, P. O. BOX 27094, 36, LALBAGH ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 027. 5. THE PRINCIPAL BHAGAVAN MAHAVEER JAIN COLLEGE, DIAGONAL ROAD, V V PURAM, BENGALURU – 560 004. 6. THE PRINCIPAL PRARTHANA CENTRAL SCHOOL, NO.30, SUBRAMANYAPURA MAIN ROAD, CHIKKABALLASANDRA – 560 061. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.R. SHAILENDRA, ADVOCATE R1; MRS. AZRA J. DUNDGE, ADVOCATE FOR R2; R3 TO R6 ARE SERVED BUT UNREPRESENTED) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED:02.11.2022 PASSED IN OS.NO.255/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE VII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:12816 RFA No. 1982 of 2023 ORAL JUDGMENT This appeal is directed against the impugned judgment and decree dated 02.11.2022 passed in O.S.No.255/2022 by the VII Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, whereby the said suit filed by the appellant – plaintiff against the respondents – defendants for declaration that her name henceforth shall be ‘Aadhya Rao’ instead of ‘Aadhya’ and for mandatory injunction directing the respondents to make necessary corrections in the Marks Cards, Certificates etc., issued by the respondents in favour of the appellant - plaintiff and for other reliefs was dismissed by the Trial Court. 2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for Respondent No.1 and learned AGA for the respondent No.2 and perused the material on record. The respondent Nos.3 to 6 having been served with notice of this appeal have chosen to remain unrepresented and have not contested the appeal. 3. The material on record discloses that the appellant – plaintiff instituted the aforesaid suit interalia contending that initially, her name was shown as ‘Aadhya’ in all her records including Marks Cards, Certificates, other documents etc., and she intended to - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:12816 RFA No. 1982 of 2023 add/affix her surname ‘Rao’ to her name and requested the respondents to make necessary changes in all her records by showing her name as ‘Aadhya Rao’ instead of ‘Aadhya’. It was contended that despite the request made by the appellant to the respondents to change her name from ‘Aadhya’ to ‘Aadhya Rao’ and inspite of issuance of letters dated 25.08.2021 and 12.11.2021 as well as legal notices dated 04.08.2021 and 28.10.2021, the respondents did not comply with the said request made by the plaintiff who instituted the aforesaid suit against the defendants before the Trial Court. 4. The respondent No.1/defendant No.1 – CBSE entered appearance before the Trial Court and contested the suit by filing its written statement. Respondent Nos.2 to 6 – defendant Nos. 2 to 6 did not enter appearance and hence, they were placed ex-parte. Appellant – plaintiff examined herself as PW-1 and documentary evidence at Exs.P-1 to P-6 were marked. The Trial Court proceeded to pass the impugned judgment and decree dismissing the suit filed by the appellant, who is before this Court by way of the present appeal. - 5 - NC: 2025:KHC:12816 RFA No. 1982 of 2023 5. The only point that arises for consideration in the present appeal is as to whether the Trial Court was justified in dismissing the suit filed by the appellant –plaintiff. 6. A perusal of the material on record clearly establishes that apart from the fact that the pleadings and evidence adduced by the appellant – plaintiff had remained unimpeached, uncontroverted and unchallenged by the respondents – defendants, who had not adduced any evidence to rebut the claim of the appellant, the cumulative effect of the evidence adduced by the appellant, is sufficient to indicate that the surname of the appellant was ‘Rao’ which was to be incorporated along with her name ‘Aadhya’ as a result of which, the name of the plaintiff is to be shown as ‘Aadhya Rao’ instead of ‘Aadhya’ in all her records, documents, Certificates, Marks Cards, etc., maintained and issued by the respondents. Under these circumstances, I am of the considered opinion that the Trial Court clearly fell in error in dismissing the suit filed by the appellants by passing the impugned judgment and decree which deserves to be set aside by this Court in the present appeal and the suit of the appellant-plaintiff deserves to be decreed in her favour. - 6 - NC: 2025:KHC:12816 RFA No. 1982 of 2023 7. In the result, I pass the following: ORDER (i) The appeal is hereby allowed. (ii) The impugned judgment and decree dated 02.11.2022 passed in O.S.No.255/2022 on the file of the VII Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge at Bengaluru (CCH-19) is hereby set aside. (iii) The aforesaid suit in O.S.No.255/2022 filed by the appellant-plaintiff is hereby decreed as prayed for by the appellants. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE SRL/MDS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 147 CT:SK