Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010491392024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 25390/2024 Between:
1. CHUNDURU SRINU BABU, S/O.RAMA KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, CULTIVATION
R/O.BANGARU GUDEM VILLAGE TACLEPALLIGUDEM MANDAL WEST GODAVARL DISTRICT. 2. BURLA VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O. GANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. CULTIVATION
R/O.BANGARU GUDEM VILLAGE TADEPALLIGUDEM MANDAL WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPLE SECRETARY PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS NELAPADU, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT,BHIMAVARAM. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, REVENUE DIVISION TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI
4. THE TAHSILDAR, TADEPALLIGUDEM MANDAL WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. DISTRICT. 5. BANGARUGUDEM GRAM PANCHAYAT, REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, BANGARUGUDEM VILLAGE, TADEPALLIGUDEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. THE SUBREGISTRAR, ANANTHAPALLI VILLAGE,
2
TADEPALLIGUDEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 7. THE MANDAL DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, TADEPALLIGUDEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 8. THE DIRECTOR, COUNTRY AND TOWN PLANNING RAJAHMAHENDRAVARAM. 9. SAMAYAVANTHULA VENKATA RAJA RATNAM, S/O. GOPALA KRISHNA, MALE, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC.MEDICAL SHOP R/O.BANGARU GUDEM VILLAGE, TADEPALLIGUDEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 10. MATTA SATYANARAYANA, S/O.RATTYYA, MALE, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O.BHUPAL NAGAR, NEAR BUS STAND SIDE OF G.V. MALL, TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or a direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the official respondents in not taking any action against the un-official respondents for formation of unapproved layout in an extent of Ac.
1.26 cents in R.S.No.345-1 of (Veerampalem Revenue), Bangarugudem Village, Tadepalligudem Mandal without following rules and regulations and without obtaining permission from the concerned departments, without leaving 10percent common site, without formation of the roads, without construction of the drains, without providing drinking water and electricity facility and without providing other amenities as per the layout rules, as illegal, irregular, arbitrary and violation of the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Gram Panchayat Land Development (Lay Out and Building) Rules and also offends Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently, take appropriate departmental disciplinary action against the official respondents for allowing the unofficial respondents to formation of the unapproved layout in the village without following mandatory procedure and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the official Respondents to take appropriate action against the unofficial respondents for formation of unapproved layout and also
3
execution of the sale deeds relating to the divided plots in an extent of Ac. 1- 26 cents in R.S.No.345-1 of Veerampalem Revenue,Bangarugudem Village, Tadepalligudem Mandal, West Godavari District pending disposal of the main writ petitionn and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV
2. Yarraguntla.Koteswara Rao,Standing Counsel For Zilla Praja Parishads,Mandal Praja Parishads and Gra
3. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS The Court made the following:
4
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 25390/2024 ORDER:
1. Sri M.Lalith Kumar, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. 2. Permission as sought for is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 15.07.2025 TTPPSS
5
06 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 25390/2024
15.07.2025 TTPPSS