IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.20202 of 2025 and connected matters Decided on: 23.12.2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CWP No.20202 of 2025 Krishan Kumar …..Petitioner Versus HPSEBL and Anr .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. CWP No.20210 of 2025 Vikas Chandel …..Petitioner Versus HPSEBL and Anr .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. CWP No.20212 of 2025 Manoj Kumar …..Petitioner Versus HPSEBL and Anr .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Sunil Dutt Gautam, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Virender Singh Kanwar, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 Sushil Kukreja, Judge(Oral) Notice. Mr. Virender Singh Kanwar, learned counsel, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matters are heard at this stage. 3. Petitioners’ grievance is that their representations, annexed with the respective writ petitions, seeking applicability of CWP No. 1638 of 2024, titled Mohit Sharma & Anr. Versus State of H.P. & Ors., decided on 29.11.2024, have not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned counsel for the respondents is not averse to this prayer. 4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matters, these writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners in 3 accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment in the case of Mohit Sharma (Supra) within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioners. The writ petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Sushil Kukreja) December 23, 2025 Judge R.Atal