[2025:RJ-JP:3586] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14188/2024 1. Kamru @ Kurru S/o Sawai, Aged About 52 Years, 2. Aarif @ Kharra S/o Hasmal @ Sindhi, Aged About 28 Years, Both are R/o Village Daulatpur (Lahchora), Police Station Goverdhan, District Mathura (U.P.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Accused-Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Chaudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 24/01/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.274/2024 registered at Police Station Deeg, District Deeg for the offences punishable under Sections 3/8 of RBA Act. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that the petitioners, who were not apprehended at spot and they are in custody since 25.10.2024. He further submits that charge-sheet has already been filed, there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners and trial of the [2025:RJ-JP:3586] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-14188/2024] case will take considerable time. He further contends that further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for petitioners. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners as also looking to the fact that charge- sheet has been filed; absence of criminal antecedents and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners – 1. Kamru @ Kurru S/o Sawai and 2. Aarif @ Kharra S/o Hasmal @ Sindhi shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that each of them shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall mark their presence once in every three months in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded. [2025:RJ-JP:3586] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-14188/2024] 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioners, as directed above. In case the petitioners fail to mark their presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to them by this Court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/85