IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 36 of 2025 Date of Decision: 15.12.2025 _______________________________________________________ Shashi Kala …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents ______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Vijay Bir Singh, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Rajan Kahol and Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Ravi Chauhan and Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocate Generals, for the respondents- State. Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): While placing on record communication dated 24.11.2025, issued under the signatures of Sr. Accountant Officer (Pen-4), Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, learned counsel representing respondent No.2, states that in terms of the mandate contained in the judgment sought to be executed, pension has been authorized in favour of the petitioner from the date of retirement i.e. 01.05.2017 with a direction to the District Treasury Officer to pay the arrears in accordance with rules. 2. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly, same is disposed of. Liberty is 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate court of law qua the surviving grievance, if any. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge December 15, 2025 (shankar)