SUNIL BHARGAVA S/O SHRI RAMCHANDRA BHARGAVA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/14273/2024 · 2025-01-23
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33002 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33002 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:3335] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14273/2024 Sunil Bhargava S/o Shri Ramchandra Bhargava, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Rajaldesar, District Churu (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deshraj Sain through VC For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP through VC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR
Order 23/01/2025
1. Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with FIR No.249/2022 registered at Police Station Dhod, District Sikar for offence under Section 8/20 of NDPS Act.
3. The petitioner is not named in the FIR. Some other co- accused, who were named in the FIR were already granted bail by different Benches of this Court and co-accused Vishnu was granted bail by this Court.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no direct material against the petitioner nor any narcotics was recovered from his possession. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedents under NDPS Act.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer for bail.
6. Considering the facts aforesaid, prayer for bail is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within two
[2025:RJ-JP:3335] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14273/2024] weeks, the petitioner above-named shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties of like amount on following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case. (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the
facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without prior permission of the trial court. (iv) One of the sureties shall be resident of territorial jurisdiction of the trial court.
7. Accordingly, this criminal misc. bail application stands allowed.
(BIRENDRA KUMAR),J 28-Nitin/Jaipur/-