MR. MEHRAJ AHMED MIR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/8709/2025 · 2025-06-30
Manoj Kumar Gupta, Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33000 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33000 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:101817-DB Court No. - 21 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8709 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mr. Mehraj Ahmed Mir Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Alok Kumar Dubey,Devansh Misra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Hemant Kumar,Mohd. Afzal,Rahul Agarwal Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.
1. Heard Sri Devansh Misra and Sri Alok Kumar Dubey, Counsel for petitioner, Sri Piyush Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Sri Hemant Kumar, learned counsel for respondent No.3, Sri Rahul Agarwal, Advocate along with Sri Mohd. Afzal on behalf of respondent No.2 and Sri Rajeev Gupta, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel on behalf of respondent No.1.
2. The petitioner, who is an allottee of 61 units in a project called Aegis One Leave Storey, developed by respondent No.3, is aggrieved by the order of withdrawal of registration of the said project under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development), Act, 2016, dated 29.07.2024 passed by respondent No.2. The case of the petitioner is that he has filed a representation on 21.01.2025 before the respondent No.2 for recall of the order dated
29.07.2024.
3. Sri Rahul Agarwal and Sri Mohd. Afzal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.2 state that respondent No.2 is already in seisin over the matter and the next date fixed is 07th of July, 2025.
4. Sri Devansh Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage the petitioner would be satisfied in case direction is issued to respondent No.2 to conclude the said proceedings.
5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.3 has no objection to the same.
6. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 to conclude the proceedings pending before it on the basis of the
representation of the petitioner dated 21.01.2025 within a period of six weeks from the date of communication of the instant order.
7. Needless to say that parties would be given proper opportunity of hearing before taking the decision.
8. Learned counsel for respondent No.3 extends an undertaking on behalf of respondent No.3 that it would appear before respondent No.2 on the next date. (R.M.N.Mishra, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.) Order Date :- 1.7.2025 Amit Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad