Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3300 (JHR)

RAJESH MANDAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./448/2025 · 2025-01-24

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 448 of 2025 ------ 1. Rajesh Mandal, aged about 32 years, son of late Jyotish Mandal 2. Pawan Mandal, aged about 45 years, son of Ramdeo Mandal 3. Akash Mandal @ Akash Kumar Mandal, aged about 23 years, Vijay Mandal All are resident of Vill -Rohini Mandal, Tola, P.O. & P.S. – Jasidih, Dist.-Deoghar, Jharkhand. … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate For the State : Mr. Santosh Kr. Shukla, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 24.01.2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Jasidih P.S. Case No.167 of 2024 registered under sections 341/342/ 323/354B/379/307/427/499/504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons attempted to murder Anil Mandal and used criminal force to disrobe the informant –Guriya Devi. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false and the main allegation is against Bipin Mandal. It is then submitted that the injury sustained by the victim is simple in nature. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertake to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertake to cooperate with the investigation of the case and further undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant or her family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, they shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs.5,000/- each and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Deoghar, in connection with Jasidih P.S. Case No.167 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioners will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish their mobile number and a copy of their Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the pendency of the case with further condition that that they will not annoy or disturb the informant or her family members in any manner during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu/Gunjan-