IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. Petition No.642/2025. Date of Decision:31st October, 2025. Som Nath .....Petitioner. Versus State of HP & Ors. …..Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Pawanish K. Shukla, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Addl. Advocate General, for the respondents. Bipin Chander Negi, Judge (oral). In pursuance to the previous order, learned Addl. Advocate General has placed on record letter dated 07.08.2025, appended along with the same is an office order of the same date i.e. dated 07.08.2025. The same is taken on record. Copy whereof has been supplied to the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. From a perusal of the aforesaid letter, it is evident that the work charge status has been accorded to the present petitioner. Hence, it is evident that in pursuance to the directions contained in the judgment sought to be executed, the case of the petitioner has been considered and the work charge status has been granted to him. In view thereof, present proceedings are closed. 3. Present petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Bipin Chander Negi) Judge 31st October, 2025 (Gaurav Rawat) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?