Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32996 (AP)

VELLANKI PAVAN KUMAR v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/25496/2024 · 2025-02-14

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010490662024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 25496/2024 Between: 1. VELLANKI PAVAN KUMAR, S/O. V RAMACHANDRA RAO, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC. JUNIOR ASSISTANT- AP ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT R/O.23-166, VASI REDDY VARI STREET, NEHRU NAGAR, NANDIGAMA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, A.P. ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT BULIDINGS, AMARAVATHI 2. THE COMMISSIONER, A.P. ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA, N.T.R.DISTRICT 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, A.P. ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT,KAKINADA. 4. SRI CHALLAM RAJU VENKATA SESHAIAH CHOULTRY, REP. BY ITS THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, VIJAYAWADA,KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. SRI RAJAGOPALA AND ANJANEYA SWAMY DEVASTANAM, REP. BY ITS THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, KODAVATIKALLU (V), CHANDARLAPADU (M), NTR DISTRICT. 6. SRI VENKATESWARA SWAMY VARI DEVASTANAM, REP. BY ITS THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TIRUMALAGIRI (V), JAGGAIAHPET (M), NTR DISTRICT. 7. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRI RAJAGOPALA AND ANJANEYA SWAMY DEVASTANAM, KODAVATIKALLU (V), CHANDARLAPADU (M), NTR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or order more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 2 respondent in issuing Memo.in.Rc.No.A1/15021/107/2020-l, Dt.24/10/2024 thereby repatriating the petitioner and Memo.ln.Rc.No.A1/15021/107/2020-lll, Dt.28/10/2024 directing the 7 respondent to take severe disciplinary action against the petitioner by framing article charges and duly following procedure and report compliance as illegal, arbitrary, highhanded and violative of principles of natural justice and and the Memo.in.Rc.No.A1/15021/107/2020-l, nd further issuing another consequently set aside Dt.24/10/2024 as well as Memo.ln.Rc.No.A1/15021/107/2020-111, Dt.28/10/2024 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of operation of impugned Memo.in.Rc.No.A1/15021/107/2020-1, Dt.24/10/2024 as well as Memo.ln.Rc.No.A1/15021/107/2020-111, Dt.28/10/2024 pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAJA MANURI VENKATA SUMANTH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: In pursuance of letter dated 04.02.2025 addressed to the Registrar (Judicial), learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in this case, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 14.02.2025 TVN 52 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.25496 OF 2024 Date: 14.02.2025 TVN