LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER CUM SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER v. SURAJ PRAKASH S/O LATE CHOGALAL
CRES/76/2024 · 2025-07-30
Ganesh Ram Meena
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32995 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32995 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:28851] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 76/2024 IN S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.1672/2016 Land Acquisition Officer Cum Sub Divisional Officer, Ajmer Tehsil And District Ajmer Raj. ----Petitioner Versus
1. Suraj Prakash S/o Late Chogalal, R/o Durai, Tehsil And District Ajmer Through His Legal Heirs. 1/1. Smt. Shanti Devi, W/o Suraj Prakash 1/2. Jagdish Prasad S/o Suraj Prakash, R/o Durai, Tehsil And District Ajmer Through Legal Heirs. 1/2/1. Smt. Sumitra W/o Jagdish Prasad, R/o Daurai Tehsil And District Ajmer. 1/2/2. Abhinav S/o Jagdish Prasad, Minor Through Mother Smt. Sumitra W/o Jagdish Prasad, R/o Daurai Tehsil And District Ajmer Raj. 1/2/3. Ayush S/o Jagdish Prasad, Minor Through Mother Smt. Sumitra W/o Jagdish Prasad, R/o Daurai Tehsil And District Ajmer. 1/3. Rajendra Prasad S/o Suraj Prakash, R/o Daurai Tehsil And District Ajmer. 1/4. Krishna Gopal S/o Suraj Prakash, R/o Daurai Tehsil And District Ajmer Raj. 1/5. Ashok Kumar S/o Suraj Prakash, R/o Daurai Tehsil And District Ajmer. 1/6. Mahendra Singh S/o Suraj Prakash, R/o Daurai Tehsil And District Ajmer. 1/7. Smt. Sunita D/o Suraj Prakash, R/o Daurai Tehsil And District Ajmer. 1/8. Smt. Renu D/o Suraj Prakash, R/o Daurai Tehsil And District Ajmer. 2. Suwalal S/o Chogalal, R/o Durai, Tehsil And District Ajmer. 3. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Food Grain (Mandi Yard) Ajmer, Through President / Secretary, Beawar Road, Durai, Ajmer Raj. [2025:RJ-JP:28851] (2 of 3) [CRES-76/2024] ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Abhilasha Vaishnav for Mr. Lokendra Singh Rao For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 30/07/2025
1. An application bearing No.303/2024 has been filed by the applicant/appellant under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of three hundred fifty three (353) days’ in filing the restoration application. 2. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant/appellant and for the reasons mentioned in the application bearing No.303/2024 filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay, same is allowed and the delay of three hundred fifty three (353) days’ in filing the restoration application is condoned. 3. The present civil restoration application has been filed by the applicant/appellant for restoration of S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.1672/2016, which was dismissed vide order dated 20.10.2022 for want of [prosecution. 4. Heard. 5. Considered the submissions made at bar. 6.
Taking into consideration the submissions made by counsel for the applicant/appellant and for the reasons mentioned in the restoration application, same is allowed at the cost of
[2025:RJ-JP:28851] (3 of 3) [CRES-76/2024] Rs.1000/- and it is ordered that S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.1672/2016 be restored at its original number and position. 7. The appellant/applicant shall deposit the cost of Rs.1000/- with the Rajasthan High Court Munshi Sangh Jaipur Bench and shall submit the receipt of the same with the Registry. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /58