- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1189 RFA No. 1928 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1928 OF 2022 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. V V SHARADHA W/O LATE SRI G M AYYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, 2. SMT G M SHEELA D/O LATE SRI G M AYYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, 3. SMT G M RADHA D/O LATE SRI G M AYYAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 4. SMT G M LAKSHMI D/O LATE SRI G M AYYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, 5. SRI G M MAHADEVAN D/O LATE SRI G M AYYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, 6. SRI G M SARASWATHI D/O LATE SRI G M AYYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.88, JANAKI NILAYAM, ANAND NAGAR, Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1189 RFA No. 1928 of 2022 CHINNAPPANHALLI EXTN, MARATHAHALLI POST, BENGALURU-560 037. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. PRABHAKAR.J., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. G M MOHAN S/O SRI LATE G M AYYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, 2. G M UNNI S/O LATE G M AYYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, 3. G M KANAKALATHA D/O SRI LATE G M AYYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.D23/12, PHASE-II, DRDO, TOWNSHIP, C.V.RAMAN NAGAR POST, BENGALURU-560 093. …RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLI RULE 1 READ WITH 96 OF THE CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the appellant is not represented. When the case is listed and is called out, the advocate must be present. His absence may affect the case. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:1189 RFA No. 1928 of 2022 As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 06.01.2025, on that day, when the case was called, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. However, finally a week’s time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the office was directed to list the appeal under the caption ‘for dismissal of appeal for non- compliance of office objections’. The appeal is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections’. Despite granting sufficient time, the appellant has not complied with the office objections. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. In view of peremptory order dated 06.01.2025, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution and also for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9