Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3299 (RAJ)

PRATAP SINGH S/O SHRI VED PRAKASH v. INDUSIND BANK LIMITED

WMAP/14/2025 · 2025-02-18

Sudesh Bansal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:7110] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 14/2025 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.21616/2019 Pratap Singh S/o Shri Ved Prakash, Aged About 75 Years, Resident Of House No. 208, Subhash Nagar,, Bharatpur, Tehsil And District Bharatpur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Indusind Bank Limited, New Number 34, Old No. Nos. 115 And 116, Gn Chetti Road, T Nagar, Chennai-600017 Through Authorized Signatory Kapil Sharma 2. Dharmendra Garg S/o Shri Vishnu Kumar Garg, R/o House No. 147, Mukherjee Nagar, Bharatpur Tehsil Bharatpur, District Bharatpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Sharda Bai Gurjar for Mr. B.R. Rana For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 18/02/2025 1. Instant civil misc. application under Section 151 CPC read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner seeking to recall the order dated 28.01.2021 whereby and whereunder on the prayer of petitioner, the writ petition being S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.21616/2019 and Civil Misc. Appeal No.4079/2019 were dismissed as withdrawn in order to avail the remedy available in law. 2. This Court finds that filing of instant application is sheer misuse of process of law, more so same has been filed after demitting the office by the concerned Judge, who pass the order dated 28.01.2021 and even after availing the alternative remedy by the petitioner before the Madras High Court. 3. In view of above, the instant miscellaneous application is dismissed. No costs. (SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /48