Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3299 (CHH)

TULSIRAM PATEL v. SMT. ASHA PATEL

CRR/109/2022 · 2025-04-03

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:15802 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 109 of 2022 1 - Tulsiram Patel S/o Kheersagar Patel, Aged About 36 Years, R/o House No. 70, Hanuman Chowk, Village P.O. Lendhra, Block Baramkela, Police Station Baramkela, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - Smt. Asha Patel W/o Tulsiram Patel, R/o Through Bhawesh Patel, House No. 2960 Ward No. 69 Dewangan Badi Behind Gokuldham Near Mahadev Ghat, Raipura, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent For Petitioner : Mr. Ashutosh Mishra, Advocate. For Respondent : None, though served. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 03-04-2025 1. Present Criminal Revision has been filed by the petitioner challenging the impugned order dated 22-10-2021 passed by the learned First Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) in MCC Case No.288/2020 (Smt. Asha Patel Vs. Tulsiram Patel). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the matter was sent for mediation and parties have settled their dispute before the Mediation Center of this Court and prepared a report/settlement to that Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN 2 effect on 28-03-2025. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties the petitioner now does not want to press the present criminal revision. 3. From perusal of the the deed of settlement dated 28-03-2025 it appears that the parties have settled their dispute on the following terms and conditions:- “1- ;g fd vihykFkhZ Jh rqylhjke iVsy vkSj mRrjokfnuh Jhefr vk'kk iVsy ,d nwljs ds lkFk 27-01-2025 ls nkEiR; thou glh [kq’kh jg jgs gS vkSj vkxs Hkh lkFk&lkFk jgus ds fy;s rS;kj gSA 2- ;g fd mHk; i{k le>kSrs ds rkSj ij mPp U;k;ky;] fcykliqj] izdj.k dz lh-vkj-vkj- 109@2022 ,oa izFke vfrfjDr iz/kku U;k;k/kh’k dqVqac U;k;ky; jk;iqj N0x0 esa py jgs izdj.k dza- 83@2022 dks okil ysdj lekIr dj ysxsA mHk;i{k bl le>kSrk i= dh 'krksZa ls lger gSa ,oa ikyu ds fy, dfVc) gSa le>kSrk i= esa nh xbZ 'krksZa dks mUgksaus viuh Lo;a dh LosPNkiwoZd lgefr ,oa fcuk fdlh ncko] Hk; ,oa ykyp ds Lohdkj fd;k x;k gS mHk;i{k us bl le>kSrk i= dh 'krksZa dks i<+us o le>us ds i'pkr viuh lgefr ls ijLij ,d&nwljs dh mifLFkfr esa gLrk{kj dj fu"ikfnr fd;kA” 4. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties on 28-03- 2025 and the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present criminal revision is disposed of in terms and conditions of the settlement dated 28-03-2025. 3 5. The respondent is at liberty to take recourse to law if cause of action further arise. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Aadil