Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32988 (CHH)

SHAKUNTALA NAIR v. CHIEF MANAGER

WPC/2912/2019 · 2025-03-25

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:14312 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2912 of 2019 1. Shakuntala Nair W/o M.M. Nair Aged About 67 Years R/o House No. 789, Kailash Nagar Kurud, Bhiali, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. 2. M. Madhvan Nair, S/o Late Narayanan Kurup, Aged About 70 Years R/o House No. 789, Kailash Nagar Kurud, Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. Chief Manager Central Bank Of India, Head Office, New Delhi ( India ) 2. General Manager, Central Bank Of India Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Branch Manager, Bhilai - 3 Branch, Central Bank Of India, Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioners : Mr. Faiz Kazi, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Pranjal Shukla, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Anand Shukla, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 25. 03.2025 1. Mr. Anand Shukla, counsel appearing for respondents, on instruction, would submit that the dispute between the parties has already been settled and the petitioners have made payment of the outstanding amount to the Bank and the account has been closed under one-time settlement scheme on 17.03.2020, and thus, the instant petition has become infructuous. 2. Heard. 3. During the course of argument, Mr. Anand Shukla, Advocate, has provided SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2025.03.25 17:27:54 +0530 2 a copy of Bank account of the petitioners, and its perusal would show that the account has already been closed; therefore, this petition is disposed of. However, the petitioners would be at liberty to revive their prayer if cause of action still survives. 4. The document supplied by Mr. Anand Shukla, Advocate, is taken on record. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge $iddhant