IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. RSA No.288 of 2016 Decided on: 7th October, 2025 Bharat Bhushan Sood .......appellant versus Tribhuvan Sood (since deceased) through his LRs ...Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the appellant: Ms.Devyani Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr.Shivam Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr.Y.P. Sood, Advocate for respondent No.1(b). Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the appellant on instructions from the appellant submits that due to subsequent developments, the appellant does not want to proceed further with the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, so also the pending applications, if any. October 07, 2025 ( Satyen Vaidya ) (naveen) Judge 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.