1 2025:CGHC:29590 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 809 of 2014 1 - Smt. Niharika Jecob W/o. Rajnikant Jecob Aged About 25 Years R/o. Opposite Church Of God Shanti Nagar Jagdalpur P.S. Kotwali, Rev. And Civil Distt. Bastar C.G., Chhattisgarh 2 - Miss Dhanya D/o Rajnikant Jecob Aged About 2 Years R/o. Opposite Church Of God Shanti Nagar Jagdalpur P.S. Kotwali, Rev. And Civil Distt. Bastar C.G., District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh ... Applicant(s) versus Rajnikant Jecob S/o. Late H.L. Jecob Aged About 30 Years R/o. Mother Teresa Ward Mission Compound P.S. Bodhghat Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar C.G., Chhattisgarh ... Non-Applicant(s) For Applicant(s) : Mr. Pravin Kumar Tulsyan, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 01 /07/2025 1. Heard Mr. Pravin Kumar Tulsyan, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. The present criminal revision has been filed by the appellant against the order dated 14.05.2014 passed by the learned learned Family Court Jagdalpur, District – Bastar (C.G.) in MJC No.18/2014, whereby learned AKHILESH KUMAR DEWANGAN Digitally signed by AKHILESH KUMAR DEWANGAN 2 Family Court has granted Rs.2,500/- per month as interim maintenance to the respondent No.2 in the application under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. 3. The present criminal revision is beyond time as has been reported by the Registry. Notice was issued to the respondent by this Court vide order dated 13.11.2014 and as per the Family Court records, it transpires that on 13.10.2016 applicant-Niharika Jacob failed to appear before the Family Court for pressing her case for maintenance under Section 125 of CrPC. 4. From perusal of application for condonation of delay, it is apparent that the applicant has not given day to day explanation of inordinate delay of 87 days in filing the revision, as such, the revision is barred by delay and laches and is not liable to be entertained. 5. Considering the grounds raised in I.A. No. 01, I do not find any good ground to condone the delay of 87 days in preferring the revision. 6. Accordingly, I.A. No. 01 is rejected and consequently thereto, the revision is also dismissed. 7. Registrar (Judicial) is directed to transmit the original record to the concerned trial Court within a week from today for necessary information and follow up action. Sd/- Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Akhil