1 2025:CGHC:35694 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 3558 of 2025 Ramesh Kumar Lal S/o Late Shree R.D. Lal Aged About 60 Years R/o Mangla, P.S. Civil Line District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Director General Of Police Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Superintendent Of Police Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Rahul Rajdan Ceo, Team Jio, Reliance Corporate Park Tc-22, Thane Belapur Road, Ghansoli Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400701 ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Sareena Khan, Advocate For State : Mr. Satish Gupta, GA Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 24/07/2025 1. With the consent of counsel for the parties, matter is heard finally. 2. The petitioner has been filed this writ petition on the following relief(s) : VASANT KUMAR Digitally signed by VASANT KUMAR Date: 2025.07.24 17:30:31 +0530 2 “10.1 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and directed to respondents for restoration of mobile number 98261-61786 of the petitioner. 10.2 That, Any other relief(s) as the Hon'ble Court be deemed to fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 3. Counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner is filed this petition for restoration of the Jio Mobile no. 98261-61786, which service has been stopped from 16 may 2025, petitioner is retired Professor and permanent resident of the mention above address. On 18/04/2024, petitioner has received a call on phone no. 98261-61786 from the phone no. 81513-71033 and narrated that the Mobile no. 98920-76759 of the Airtel co. has been issued and that no. used for from by petitioner Id's threatened to people and abused daily at Mumbai there for all Mobile No. will be stopped. On 16/05/2025, it about 7:30 pm all services are stopped of phone number. The number was linked of all Government site account number, EPF, Adhar card, PAN Card, CAD, Driving license and DG locker. Hence, this petition. 4. Learned State counsel opposes the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record with utmost circumspection. 3 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submission made by counsel for the parties. On perusal of record, I have found that one the complainant Neha Upadhyay R/o Akaltara District Janjgir Champa (CG) has made a complaint against Mob. No. 98261-61786 (belonging to the petitioner) alleging, inter-alia, commission of fraud of Rs. 57,000/- from her in the name of giving employment / job and an acknowledgment bearing no. 33303250008111 in this regard is reflected in the said portal and in the suspect deals, the suspect mobile no. is shown to be 9826161786. Based upon the said information, a request has been made to the Superintendent of Police, District Janjgir Champa to supply the information and documents alongwith the information / action taken by the police on the complaint made by the complainant Neha Upadhyaya. Further considering that in response to the letter dated 20/07/2025, the Superintendent of Police District Janjgir Champa has immediately directed the In-charge Cyber Cell, District Police Office, District Janjgir Champa to do the needful in the matter and pursuant to the said direction of the Superintendent of Police District Janjgir Champa, the In-charge Cyber Cell, District Police Office, District Janjgir Champa has immediately went to the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal (www.cybercrime.gov.in) and thereafter, a complaint bearing no. 33303250008111 regarding commission of fraud of Rs.57,000/- has been found to be made by complainant Neha Upadhyaya. 4 7. Taking into consideration the fact that the relief which has been sought by the petitioner cannot be granted in exercise of writ jurisdiction, in view of the considered opinion of this Court, no case is made out for any interference. 8. Accordingly, the petition being devoid of any merit is liable to be and is hereby dismissed. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Vasant