ASHOK BHAURAO PATIL v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
WP/8268/2025 · 2026-08-11
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3298 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3298 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
77-WP.8268.2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 77 WRIT PETITION NO. 8268 OF 2025 Ashok Bhaurao Patil VERSUS The State of Maharashtra And Others ... Mr. Syed Azizoddin, Advocate for the Petitioner Ms. S. S Joshi, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3-State. Mr. Hon Ashwin Vinayak, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 4 to 6. Mr. Nitin Trimbak Tribhuwan, Advocate for Respondent No.7. … CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT & JITENDRA JAIN, JJ. DATE : 11th AUGUST, 2026 PER COURT :
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. It is stated that the Management is ready to forward the pension proposal of the petitioner afresh. The learned Advocate for Zilla Parishad makes a statement if the proposal is forwarded by the Management, the same will be forwarded within a period of eight weeks. Respondent no.7 to consider the proposal afresh within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of such proposal.
3. The management/school to forward the proposal within four weeks from today. The proposal be considered in accordance with law. We clarify that the proposal be considered without raising the query as regards continuity in service as the said issue is already Sayyed 1/2 2026:BHC-AUG:35514-DB
77-WP.8268.2025 settled by this Court by judgment dated 29.11.2016 in Writ Petition No.1036 of 2003.
4. In view of above, petition stands disposed off.
(JITENDRA JAIN, J.) (KISHORE C. SANT, J.) Sayyed 2/2