Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32975 (CHH)

MRS. SHAMPA TRIPATHI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/7492/2025 · 2025-07-29

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:37394 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7492 of 2025 1 - Mrs. Shampa Tripathi W/o Shri Akhilendra Pratap Tripathi Aged About 61 Years R/o C/o Akhilendra Pratap Singh, A-1, Ward No. 54, Old Dhamtari Road, New Swagat Vihar, Dunda, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - District Collector And Chairman District Level Rationalisation Committee, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - District Education Officer And Secretary District Level Rationalisation Committee, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Principal Divisional Ideal Schedule Caste Girls Ashram School, Raipur, Block- Dharsiwa, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Pranali Maate Teacher (L B) (Science) (T-Class), Through Principal, Divisional Ideal Schedule Caste Girls Ashram School, Raipur, Block- Dharsiwa, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Chandrika Verma Teacher (L B) (Arts) (T-Class), (Since Last 5 Years Working In Literacy Mission, Raipur) Through The District Education Officer, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Suryapratap Yuddhaveer Singh, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.P. Kale, Additional A.G. VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2025.07.31 11:36:43 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 30/07/2025 1. This is second round of litigation. In the earlier round of litigation the writ petition filed by the petitioner against his/her transfer order after declaring surplus Teacher under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions, was disposed of on 13.06.2025 with liberty to move fresh representation, if already not made, and in turn the District Rationalization Committee was directed to decide the same within specific time period. Now this petition has been filed after rejection of representation filed by the petitioner. 2. The counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner vide notification dated 07.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is 3 dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue his/her representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved