1 2025:CGHC:33661 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7216 of 2025 1 - Kamlesh Kumar Kurre S/o Ram Brij Aged About 51 Years Posted As Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Jampara, Block - Manendragarh, District Manendragarh-Chirmiri-Bharatpur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Public Instruction, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur 3 - The Collector And President District Rationalization Committee, District Manendragarh-Chirmiri-Bharatpur (C.G.) 4 - District Education Officer District Manendragarh-Chirmiri-Bharatpur (C.G.) 5 - District Education Officer And Secretary District Level Rationalization Committee, District Manendragarh-Chirmiri-Bharatpur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Parag Kotecha, Advocate For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Sabyasachi Choubey, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 17/07/2025 1. This is second round of litigation. In the earlier round of litigation the writ petition filed by the petitioner against his/her transfer order after declaring surplus Teacher under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions, was VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2025.07.18 18:42:10 +0530 2 disposed of on 20.06.2025 with liberty to move fresh representation, if already not made, and in turn the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee was directed to decide the same within specific time period. Now this petition has been filed after rejection of representation filed by the petitioner. 2. The counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner vide notification dated 07.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue his/her representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same, in objective manner, by reasoned order, on its own merits, in accordance with law, as early as possible. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved