Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32968 (JHR)

KUNAL YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./10901/2025 · 2025-12-03

Ambuj Nath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:36231) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 10900 of 2025 ------- Dinesh Ray, aged 32 years, son of Ramji Ray, at present R/o Village Chatakpur, P.O. & P.S. Ratu, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. R/o Samsipur, P.O. Lodiyahi, P.S. Bachhawara, District Begusarai, Bihar. …... …. Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. …. Opp. Party WITH B.A. No. 10901 of 2025 ------- Kunal Yadav, aged 25 years, son of Late Singesar Yadav, resident of Ravi Steal Road, SGM College, P.O. Pandra, P.S. Sukhdeonagar, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. …... …. Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. …. Opp. Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH -------- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Pandey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P. P. Mr. Gautam Rakesh, A.P.P. -------- 02/ Dated 03.12.2025 Heard the parties. Both these bail applications arise out of the same police case and as such, these bail applications are being heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Sukhdeonagar (Pandra O.P.) P.S. Case No. 514 of 2025, for the offence under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 132, 109, 126(2), 115(2), 324(4)(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 3 of Damage of Public Property Act, pending in the court of Miss Archana Kumari, leaned JMFC at Ranchi. On 20.09.2025 at about 6:30 P.M., 400-500 persons attacked Sukhdeonagar (Pandra O.P.) to protest against an accidental death of one Uttam Kumar. It is alleged that accused persons damaged the vehicles of police, parked at the police station and other articles. It is further alleged that some of the police personnel were also injured. -2- It was submitted that there is no specific allegation against the petitioners. It was further submitted that there is specific allegation against co-accused Chandan Kumar and Roshan Sao. It was finally submitted that similarly situated co-accused person has been granted bail by this Court earlier. In view of the submission made above, I am inclined to release the petitioners, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners, named above, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of Miss Archana Kumari, leaned JMFC at Ranchi, or her successor, in connection with Sukhdeonagar (Pandra O.P.) P.S. Case No. 514 of 2025. (Ambuj Nath, J.) December 03, 2025 BS/- Uploaded on 04.12.2025