IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. Pet. No.960 of 2025 Decided on: 7th October, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Jitendra Gandhi …..Petitioner Versus Union of India and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Dhiraj Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Ms. Reeta Thakur, Senior Panel Counsel, for respondent No.1. Mr. Vivek Singh Attri, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3. Mr. Yudhbir Singh Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.4. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after the filing of this execution petition, the respondents have released pension in favour of the petitioner, therefore, though the judgment in question stands complied with qua the petitioner, however, pension has been paid to him on pro-rata basis, qua which the petitioner has reservation. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner also 1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes 2 has grievance about computation of pension, therefore, these proceedings be closed, but liberty be reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of his surviving grievances. In view of above submissions, granting liberty as prayed for by the petitioner, the present execution petition is disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua October 07, 2025 Judge Mukesh