Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:21188-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18137/2022 M/s Goyal Colour Lab, (Partnership Firm), 158-159, Nehru Bazar, Jaipur (Raj.), Thorugh Its Partner Sh. Brij Kishore Goyal. ----Petitioner Versus
1. Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax, Division -E, Pali, Ground Floor, Tdm Office Campus, Bsnl, Mahavir Nagar, Pali - 306401 (Raj.)
2. Deputy Commissioner, Central Goods And Service Tax, Division-E, Pali, Ground Floor, Tdm Office Campus, Bsnl, Mahavir Nagar, Pali - 306401 (Raj.)
3. Additional Commissioner Of Central Excise, Central Excise Commissionerate- Ii, Jaipur, New Central Revenue Building, Statue Circle, C-Scheme, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Javed Khan, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ajay Shukla, Adv. with Mr. Raghav Sharma & Mr. Pushpendra Badgoti HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT
Order 20/05/2025
1. This petition is filed challenging the adjudication order dated 28.03.2022 Annexure-1 annexed with the petition.
2. On 28.03.2025 the following order was passed:-
“A request for adjournment is made on behalf of
learned counsel for the petitioner is opposed by counsel for the respondent stating that there is a statutory remedy of appeal available. In the interest of justice, put up on 04.04.2025 at the top of the cause-list.”
[2025:RJ-JP:21188-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-18137/2022]
3. The submission by learned counsel for the petitioner is that call book matters cannot be revived after a decade.
4. The petitioner has statutory remedy of appeal and no case is made out for exercising writ jurisdiction.
5. The writ petition is dismissed relegating the petitioner to remedy of appeal.
(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J GAURAV /48