IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.6944 of 2022 Decided on: 09.12.2025 Ankit …Petitioner Versus Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishwa vidyalaya, Palampur .…Respondents ……………………………………………………………………………… Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Ganesh Barowalia, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Ms. Anjali Soni Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that advertisement in question was not processed by the respondents to its logical conclusion; The grievance of the petitioner raised in this writ petition has even otherwise been redressed in Anubhav Thakur versus CSKHPKV & Others and another.2 2. In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge December 09, 2025 (yogesh) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 CWP No.14366/2025, decided on 20.11.2025.