Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3296 (RAJ)

SACHIN KUMAR PAL @ RAVI S/O OMPRAKASH PAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/636/2025 · 2025-02-24

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:8149] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 636/2025 Sachin Kumar Pal @ Ravi S/o Omprakash Pal, R/o Plot No. 99, Badayu Road, Nekpur Bareili, Police Station Subhash Nagar, Dis- trict Bareili, Uttar Pradesh, At Present Tenant Kalyan Hostel, Room No. 118, Goverdhan Nagar, Police Station Malpura Gate, District Jaipur. (Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumit Kaswa For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 24/02/2025 1. This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with FIR No.245/2024 registered at Police Station Sodala, Jaipur City (South) for offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he is in custody since 17.06.2024. Learned counsel further submits that the Police after completion of investigation has submitted charge-sheet in the matter. Learned counsel also submits that the co-accused, namely, Warish Khan and Sarvesh Kumar Tiwari @ Gokul have already been enlarged on bail by this Court in CRLMB No.15946/2024 & [2025:RJ-JP:8149] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-636/2025] 15945/2024 respectively and the case of the present petitioner is on better footing. Therefore, he may be released on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on record. 5. Having regard the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner so also the fact that the Police after completion of investigation has submitted charge-sheet and the co-accused in this case have already been enlarged on bail, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that the accused-petitioner named above shall be released on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/-, together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /17