Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32959 (RAJ)

STATE OF RAJASTHAN v. KANTA DAUGHTER OF SUKHDEV

CRLR/2023/2022 · 2025-01-17

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:2456] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 2023/2022 State of Rajasthan, R/o ----Petitioner Versus 1. Kanta Daughter of Sukhdev, Aged About 26 Years, Resident of Sathana Vijay Nagar Ajmer 2. Ved Raj Son of Shri Sukh Dev, Aged About 24 Years, Resident of Sathana Vijay Nagar Ajmer 3. Chhotu Son of Heera Lal, Aged About 44 Years, Resident of Sathana Vijay Nagar Ajmer 4. Sukh Dev Son of Heera Lal, Aged About 55 Years, Resident of Sathana Vijay Nagar Ajmer 5. Parsi Wife of Chhotu Lal, Aged About 41 Years, Resident of Sathana Vijay Nagar Ajmer ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 17/01/2025 The matter comes up on an application (IA No.623/2022) filed by the applicant-State under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 255 days in filing the revision petition. On perusal of the averments made in the application, this Court finds that no specific sufficient reasons have been given out for delay in filing the revision petition. As per the averments in the memo of the application, the District Magistrate send the matter to the Law and Legal Affairs Department, Government of Rajasthan on 18.12.2021, after giving details for filing the revision [2025:RJ-JP:2456] (2 of 2) [CRLR-2023/2022] petition, however, the revision petition has been filed after a delay of eleven (11) months, thereafter. This Court finds no sufficient reason to condone the delay in filing the revision petition. Accordingly, the application (IA No.623/2022) for condonation of delay is dismissed. As a result, the revision petition being time barred is also dismissed. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J DIVYA SAINI /43